ArticleHealth information science and systems2015
Automatic detection of tweets reporting cases of influenza like illnesses in Australia.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Acute respiratory infections prediction through social media data and machine learning: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- The Application of Internet-Based Sources for Public Health Surveillance (Infoveillance): Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Identifying Methods for Monitoring Foodborne Illness: Review of Existing Public Health Surveillance Techniques.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2018Review
- Twitter Influenza Surveillance: Quantifying Seasonal Misdiagnosis Patterns and their Impact on Surveillance Estimates.Online journal of public health informatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of disease outbreaks is critical for disease spread control and management. In this work we investigate the suitability of statistical machine learning approaches to automatically detect Twitter messages (tweets) that are likely to report cases of possible influenza like illnesses (ILI). Empirical results obtained on a large set of tweets originating from the state of Victoria, Australia, in a 3.5 month period show evidence that machine learning classifiers are effective in identifying tweets that mention possible cases of ILI (up to 0.736 F-measure, i.e. the harmonic mean of precision and recall), regardless of the specific technique implemented by the classifier investigated in the study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.