ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015
Direct electric stimulation to increase cerebrovascular function.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- iGlucoSnFR2: A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor for measuring intracellular or extracellular glucose in vivo in mouse brain.Science advances · 2025Article
- Dynamic changes in the structure and function of brain mural cells around chronically implanted microelectrodes.Biomaterials · 2025Article
- Current implications of EEG and fNIRS as functional neuroimaging techniques for motor recovery after stroke.Medical review (2021) · 2024Review
- Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: A Preliminary Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cerebral Microcirculation and Oxygenation Modulation by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Awake and Anesthetized Mice.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Grey-box modeling and hypothesis testing of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based cerebrovascular reactivity to anodal high-definition tDCS in healthy humans.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Pericytes: Intrinsic Transportation Engineers of the CNS Microcirculation.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Self-Regulation of Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent Response: Primary Effect or Epiphenomenon?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Computational Pipeline for NIRS-EEG Joint Imaging of tDCS-Evoked Cerebral Responses-An Application in Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Cortical Neuronal Activity in Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Bidirectional interactions between neuronal and hemodynamic responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges for brain-state dependent tDCS.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Rapid, Dose-Dependent Enhancement of Cerebral Blood Flow by transcranial AC Stimulation in Mouse.Brain stimulationArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.