Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25870395›Full record

SynthesisPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Social status, immune response and parasitism in males: a meta-analysis.

Bobby Habig, Elizabeth A Archie

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring dominance certainty and assessing its impact on individual and societal health in a nonhuman primate model: a network approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Agonism and grooming behaviour explain social status effects on physiology and gene regulation in rhesus macaques.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictors of helminth parasite infection in female chacma baboons (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sociality and parasite transmission.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bobby HabigDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, 100 Galvin Life Sciences Center, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA rhabig@nd.edu.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, 100 Galvin Life Sciences Center, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In male vertebrates, two conflicting paradigms--the energetic costs of high dominance rank and the chronic stress of low rank--have been proposed to explain patterns of immune function and parasitism. To date, neither paradigm has provided a complete explanation for status-related differences in male health. Here, we applied meta-analyses to test for correlations between male social status, immune responses and parasitism. We used an ecoimmunological framework, which proposes that males should re-allocate investment in different immune components depending on the costs of dominance or subordination. Spanning 297 analyses, from 77 studies on several vertebrate taxa, we found that most immune responses were similar between subordinate and dominant males, and neither dominant nor subordinate males consistently invested in predictable immune components. However, subordinate males displayed significantly lower delayed-type hypersensitivity and higher levels of some inflammatory cytokines than dominant males, while dominant males exhibited relatively lower immunoglobulin responses than subordinate males. Despite few differences in immunity, dominant males exhibited consistently higher parasitism than subordinate males, including protozoan blood parasites, ectoparasites and gastrointestinal helminths. We discuss our results in the context of the costs of dominance and subordination and advocate future work that measures both parasitism and immune responses in wild systems.

Indexed as

Social DominanceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHumansMaleModels, BiologicalParasitic Diseases, AnimalStress, Physiologicaldominance rankimmune functionlife-history trade-offsparasitismsocial status

Identifiers

PMID25870395
PMCPMC4410375
OpenAlexW2112828824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.