Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25870068›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Limited sampling strategy and target attainment analysis for levofloxacin in patients with tuberculosis.

Abdullah Alsultan, Guohua An, Charles A Peloquin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate the Exposition of Different Lipid Nanocaspules.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treating tuberculosis with high doses of anti-TB drugs: mechanisms and outcomes.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdullah AlsultanUniversity of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, and the Emerging Pathogens Institute, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Guohua AnUniversity of Iowa, College of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Charles A PeloquinUniversity of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, and the Emerging Pathogens Institute, Gainesville, Florida, USA peloquin@cop.ufl.edu.
Florida College · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Tuberculosis Prevention Research Unit /TBRU/-266095383N01AI095383 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 2000 to 2005
$5.6M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI095383NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-7022NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI95383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need to improve and shorten the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Levofloxacin, a newer fluoroquinolone, has potent activity against TB both in vitro and in vivo. Levofloxacin dosing can be optimized to improve the treatment of both TB and MDR-TB. Levofloxacin efficacy is linked primarily to the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for the free fraction of drug (fAUC) to the MIC. Since obtaining a full-time concentration profile is not feasible in the clinic, we developed a limited sampling strategy (LSS) to estimate the AUC. We also utilized Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the dosing of levofloxacin. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 10 Brazilian TB patients. The pharmacokinetic data were fitted with a one-compartment model. LSSs were developed using two methods: linear regression and Bayesian approaches. Several LSSs predicted levofloxacin AUC with good accuracy and precision. The most accurate were the method using two samples collected at 4 and 6 h (R(2) = 0.91 using linear regression and 0.97 using Bayesian approaches) and that using samples collected at 2 and 6 h (R(2) = 0.90 using linear regression and 0.96 using Bayesian approaches). The 2-and-6-h approach also provides a good estimate of the maximum concentration of the drug in serum (Cmax). Our target attainment analysis showed that higher doses (17 to 20 mg/kg of body weight) of levofloxacin might be needed to improve its activity. Doses in the range of 17 to 20 mg/kg showed good target attainment for MICs from 0.25 to 0.50. At an MIC of 2, poor target attainment was observed across all doses. This LSS for levofloxacin can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring and for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsArea Under CurveBrazilHumansLevofloxacinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryYoung AdultAntitubercular AgentsLevofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID25870068
PMCPMC4468713
OpenAlexW2162897266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.