ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015
Coexpression of c-Met and Notch-1 correlates with poor prognosis in resected non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prognostic Role of MET Protein Expression Among Surgically Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Different Expression Levels of DLK2 Inhibit NOTCH Signaling and Inversely Modulate MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Tumor Growth In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Targeting Notch to overcome radiation resistance.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Landscape in Lung Cancer: Therapeutical Implications.Disease markers · 2016Review
- Prognostic value of Notch-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
- KRAS and MET in non-small-cell lung cancer: two of the new kids on the 'drivers' block.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite considerable advances in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, target therapy, and biological therapy, the prognosis for those with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not substantially improved. It was recently reported that two receptors, Notch-1 and c-Met, correlate directly or indirectly with the initiation and development of malignant tumors, such as lung cancer; however, the prognostic value of coexpression of these receptors and their relationship in resected NSCLC was not clear. In this study, the expression levels of Notch-1 and c-Met in 117 patients with resected NSCLC were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results showed that the positive expression rate of Notch-1 in total patients was 59.8 %. The positive expression rate of c-Met in the all population was 69.2 %. In addition, a significant positive association was shown between Notch-1 and c-Met (P < 0.001). Simultaneously, patients with coexpression of both receptors had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without coexpression (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that T stage (P = 0.016) and c-Met expression (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, coexpression of both receptors correlates with poorer prognosis in patients with resected NSCLC. Targeting both receptors simultaneously may prove a more effective antitumor strategy. Patients with coexpression of both receptors might benefit from cotargeting Notch-1 and c-Met.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.