Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25869870›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2015

Social egg freezing: risk, benefits and other considerations.

Angel Petropanagos, Alana Cattapan, Françoise Baylis, Arthur Leader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Social Egg Freezing-A Trend or Modern Reality?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Examining reasons that patients discard cryopreserved oocytes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angel PetropanagosNovel Tech Ethics (Petropanagos, Cattapan, Baylis), Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa Fertility Centre (Leader), Ottawa, Ont. angel.p@dal.ca.
Alana CattapanNovel Tech Ethics (Petropanagos, Cattapan, Baylis), Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa Fertility Centre (Leader), Ottawa, Ont.
Françoise BaylisNovel Tech Ethics (Petropanagos, Cattapan, Baylis), Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa Fertility Centre (Leader), Ottawa, Ont.
Arthur LeaderNovel Tech Ethics (Petropanagos, Cattapan, Baylis), Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa Fertility Centre (Leader), Ottawa, Ont.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research EOG111389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CryopreservationAdultAge FactorsFemaleFertility PreservationFertilization in VitroHumansOocyte RetrievalReproductive BehaviorRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25869870
PMCPMC4467930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.