Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25869638›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2015

Relationship Among Anal Sphincter Injury, Patulous Anal Canal, and Anal Pressures in Patients With Anorectal Disorders.

David Prichard, Doris M Harvey, Joel G Fletcher, Alan R Zinsmeister, Adil E Bharucha

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Functional and Anatomical Significance of Patulous Anus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. High-resolution Anorectal Manometry for Identifying Defecatory Disorders and Rectal Structural Abnormalities in Women.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017
    Article
  15. Functional Anorectal Disorders.Gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
  16. How to Perform and Interpret a High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Test.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David PrichardClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Doris M HarveyClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joel G FletcherDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alan R ZinsmeisterDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Adil E BharuchaClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Pathophysiology of Anorectal DisordersR01DK078924 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2008 to 2023
$5.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe anal sphincters and puborectalis are imaged routinely with an endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coil, which does not assess co-aptation of the anal canal at rest. By using a MRI torso coil, we identified a patulous anal canal in some patients with anorectal disorders. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between anal sphincter and puborectalis injury, a patulous anal canal, and anal pressures.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data from 119 patients who underwent MRI and manometry analysis of anal anatomy and pressures, respectively, from February 2011 through March 2013 at the Mayo Clinic. Anal pressures were determined by high-resolution manometry, anal sphincter and puborectalis injury was determined by endoanal MRI, and anal canal integrity was determined by torso MRI. Associations between manometric and anatomic parameters were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsFecal incontinence (55 patients; 46%) and constipation (36 patients; 30%) were the main indications for testing; 49 patients (41%) had a patulous anal canal, which was associated with injury to more than 1 muscle (all P ≤ .001), and internal sphincter (P < .01), but not puborectalis (P = .09) or external sphincter (P = .06), injury. Internal (P < .01) and external sphincter injury (P = .02) and a patulous canal (P < .001), but not puborectalis injury, predicted anal resting pressure. A patulous anal canal was the only significant predictor (P < .01) of the anal squeeze pressure increment.

conclusionsPatients with anorectal disorders commonly have a patulous anal canal, which is associated with more severe anal injury and independently predicted anal resting pressure and squeeze pressure increment. It therefore is important to identify a patulous anal canal because it appears to be a marker of not only anal sphincter injury but disturbances beyond sphincter injury, such as damage to the anal cushions or anal denervation.

Indexed as

Hydrostatic PressureAdultAgedAnal CanalAnus DiseasesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleManometryMiddle AgedPerineumRetrospective StudiesAnal Sphincter DefectsAnorectal ImagingDiagnosisRisk Factor

Identifiers

PMID25869638
PMCPMC4575824
OpenAlexW2084733921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.