Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25869633›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2015

Effects of different elevated CO2 concentrations on chlorophyll contents, gas exchange, water use efficiency, and PSII activity on C3 and C4 cereal crops in a closed artificial ecosystem.

Minjuan Wang, Beizhen Xie, Yuming Fu, Chen Dong, Liu Hui, Liu Guanghui, Hong Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Wearable Standalone Sensing Systems for Smart Agriculture.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interactive effect of elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Elevated Atmospheric COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minjuan WangSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Beizhen XieInstitute of Environmental Biology and Life Support Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yuming FuSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Chen DongInternational Joint Research Center of Aerospace Biotechnology & Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Liu HuiInstitute of Environmental Biology and Life Support Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Liu GuanghuiSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hong LiuSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China. lh64@buaa.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although terrestrial CO2 concentrations [CO2] are not expected to reach 1000 μmol mol(-1) (or ppm) for many decades, CO2 levels in closed systems such as growth chambers and greenhouses can easily exceed this concentration. CO2 levels in life support systems (LSS) in space can exceed 10,000 ppm (1 %). In order to understand how photosynthesis in C4 plants may respond to elevated CO2, it is necessary to determine if leaves of closed artificial ecosystem grown plants have a fully developed C4 photosynthetic apparatus, and whether or not photosynthesis in these leaves is more responsive to elevated [CO2] than leaves of C3 plants. To address this issue, we evaluated the response of gas exchange, water use efficiency, and photosynthetic efficiency of PSII by soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr., 'Heihe35') of a typical C3 plant and maize (Zea mays L., 'Susheng') of C4 plant under four CO2 concentrations (500, 1000, 3000, and 5000 ppm), which were grown under controlled environmental conditions of Lunar Palace 1. The results showed that photosynthetic pigment by the C3 plants of soybean was more sensitive to elevated [CO2] below 3000 ppm than the C4 plants of maize. Elevated [CO2] to 1000 ppm induced a higher initial photosynthetic rate, while super-elevated [CO2] appeared to negate such initial growth promotion for C3 plants. The C4 plant had the highest ETR, φPSII, and qP under 500-3000 ppm [CO2], but then decreased substantially at 5000 ppm [CO2] for both species. Therefore, photosynthetic down-regulation and a decrease in photosynthetic electron transport occurred by both species in response to super-elevated [CO2] at 3000 and 5000 ppm. Accordingly, plants can be selected for and adapt to the efficient use of elevated CO2 concentration in LSS.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideChlorophyllCrops, AgriculturalDown-RegulationEcosystemGlycine maxPhotosynthesisPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationWaterZea maysCarbon DioxideChlorophyllPhotosystem II Protein ComplexWaterC3 and C4 plantsChlorophyll fluorescenceElevated [CO2]Gas exchangeLife support systemsWater use efficiency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.