ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2015
Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality.
Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of pathology-validated immortalized patient-derived ovarian endometriosis epithelial cell line.Biomedical reports · 2026Article
- Environmental Carcinogenesis as a Stochastic Evolutionary Failure of Senescence-Control Systems.Cells · 2026Review
- Towards Precision Oncology: How Advances in Cancer Genomics, Immunobiology and Artificial Intelligence Will Change Molecular Diagnostics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Chronic sublethal exposure to methylmercury lengthens telomeres in developing zebra finches.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2025Article
- Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Narrative Review Through a Case Report with Ten Years of Primary Tumor Remission Associated withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Multifaceted Properties of Usnic Acid in Disrupting Cancer Hallmarks.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Aging, Cancer, and Inflammation: The Telomerase Connection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Allicin and Cancer Hallmarks.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Telomeres and telomerase in Sarcoma disease and therapy.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- HSP90 multi-functionality in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Combining old and new concepts in targeting telomerase for cancer therapy: transient, immediate, complete and combinatory attack (TICCA).Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- TONSL Is an Immortalizing Oncogene and a Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2023Article
- Protein post-translational modifications in the regulation of cancer hallmarks.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Review
- Plants as a Source of Anticancer Agents: From Bench to Bedside.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Telomerase gene therapy: a remission toward cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Review
- Tackling heterogeneity in treatment-resistant breast cancer using a broad-spectrum therapeutic approach.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Article
- JAK/STAT Signaling: Molecular Targets, Therapeutic Opportunities, and Limitations of Targeted Inhibitions in Solid Malignancies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Epigenetic-Mediated Regulation of Gene Expression for Biological Control and Cancer: Cell and Tissue Structure, Function, and Phenotype.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022Review
- Review
- The Role of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Mechanism in Cancer: Translational and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
One of the hallmarks of malignant cell populations is the ability to undergo continuous proliferation. This property allows clonal lineages to acquire sequential aberrations that can fuel increasingly autonomous growth, invasiveness, and therapeutic resistance. Innate cellular mechanisms have evolved to regulate replicative potential as a hedge against malignant progression. When activated in the absence of normal terminal differentiation cues, these mechanisms can result in a state of persistent cytostasis. This state, termed "senescence," can be triggered by intrinsic cellular processes such as telomere dysfunction and oncogene expression, and by exogenous factors such as DNA damaging agents or oxidative environments. Despite differences in upstream signaling, senescence often involves convergent interdependent activation of tumor suppressors p53 and p16/pRB, but can be induced, albeit with reduced sensitivity, when these suppressors are compromised. Doses of conventional genotoxic drugs required to achieve cancer cell senescence are often much lower than doses required to achieve outright cell death. Additional therapies, such as those targeting cyclin dependent kinases or components of the PI3K signaling pathway, may induce senescence specifically in cancer cells by circumventing defects in tumor suppressor pathways or exploiting cancer cells' heightened requirements for telomerase. Such treatments sufficient to induce cancer cell senescence could provide increased patient survival with fewer and less severe side effects than conventional cytotoxic regimens. This positive aspect is countered by important caveats regarding senescence reversibility, genomic instability, and paracrine effects that may increase heterogeneity and adaptive resistance of surviving cancer cells. Nevertheless, agents that effectively disrupt replicative immortality will likely be valuable components of new combinatorial approaches to cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.