Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25869427›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Dynamics and distribution of bacterial and archaeal communities in oil-contaminated temperate coastal mudflat mesocosms.

Gbemisola O Sanni, Frédéric Coulon, Terry J McGenity

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mixing of plant litters strengthens their remediation effects on crude oil-contaminated soil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microbial ecology of hydrocarbon-polluted coastal sediments.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  17. Changes in the microbial community during bioremediation of gasoline-contaminated soil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gbemisola O SanniSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Frédéric CoulonSchool of Energy, Environment and Agrifood, Cranfield University, Building 40, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
Terry J McGenitySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK. tjmcgen@essex.ac.uk.
University of Essex · GBCranfield University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mudflats are ecologically important habitats that are susceptible to oil pollution, but intervention is difficult in these fine-grained sediments, and so clean-up usually relies on natural attenuation. Therefore, we investigated the impact of crude oil on the bacterial, diatom and archaeal communities within the upper parts of the diatom-dominated sediment and the biofilm that detached from the surface at high tide. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons was rapid, with a 50 % decrease in concentration in the 0-2-mm section of sediment by 3 days, indicating the presence of a primed hydrocarbon-degrading community. The biggest oil-induced change was in the biofilm that detached from the sediment, with increased relative abundance of several types of diatom and of the obligately hydrocarbonoclastic Oleibacter sp., which constituted 5 % of the pyrosequences in the oiled floating biofilm on day 3 compared to 0.6 % in the non-oiled biofilm. Differences in bacterial community composition between oiled and non-oiled samples from the 0-2-mm section of sediment were only significant at days 12 to 28, and the 2-4-mm-sediment bacterial communities were not significantly affected by oil. However, specific members of the Chromatiales were detected (1 % of sequences in the 2-4-mm section) only in the oiled sediment, supporting other work that implicates them in anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation. Unlike the Bacteria, the archaeal communities were not significantly affected by oil. In fact, changes in community composition over time, perhaps caused by decreased nutrient concentration and changes in grazing pressure, overshadowed the effect of oil for both Bacteria and Archaea. Many obligate hydrocarbonoclastic and generalist oil-degrading bacteria were isolated, and there was little correspondence between the isolates and the main taxa detected by pyrosequencing of sediment-extracted DNA, except for Alcanivorax, Thalassolituus, Cycloclasticus and Roseobacter spp., which were detected by both methods.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiofilmsDiatomsGeologic SedimentsHydrocarbonsPetroleumPetroleum PollutionRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, ChemicalHydrocarbonsPetroleumRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, Chemical454 PyrosequencingArchaeal communitiesBiodegradationHydrocarbon-degrading bacteriaMudflatsOil pollutionT-RFLP

Identifiers

PMID25869427
OpenAlexW1988616070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.