Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25869018›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

Medical Residents and Interprofessional Interactions in Discharge: An Ethnographic Exploration of Factors That Affect Negotiation.

Joanne Goldman, Scott Reeves, Robert Wu, Ivan Silver, Kathleen MacMillan, Simon Kitto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanne GoldmanInstitute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. joanne.goldman@utoronto.ca.
Scott ReevesCenter for Health & Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston University & St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Robert WuDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ivan SilverCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathleen MacMillanSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Simon KittoDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional collaboration is an important aspect of patient discharge from a general internal medicine (GIM) unit. However, there has been minimal empirical or theoretical research that has examined interactions that occur between medical residents and other healthcare professionals in the discharge process. This study provides insight into the social processes that shape and characterize such interactions.

objectiveTo explore factors that shape interactions between medical residents and other healthcare professionals in relation to patient discharge, and to examine the opportunities for negotiations about discharge between these professional groups.

designA qualitative ethnographic approach using observations, interviews and documentary analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingHealthcare professionals working in a GIM unit in Canada. APPROACH: Sixty-five hours of observations were undertaken in a range of settings (e.g. interprofessional rounds, medical and nursing rounds, nursing station) in the unit over a 17-month period. A maximum variation sampling approach was used to identify healthcare professionals working in the unit. Twenty-three interviews were completed, recorded and transcribed verbatim. A directed content approach using theories of medical dominance and negotiated order was used to analyze the data. KEY

resultsThe organization of clinical work in combination with clinical teaching influenced interprofessional interactions and the quality of discharge in this GIM unit. While organizational activities (orientation and rounds) and individual activities (e.g. role modeling, teaching) supported negotiations between medical residents and other healthcare professionals around discharge, participants had varied perspectives about their effectiveness.

conclusionsThis study illuminates social factors and processes that require attention in order to address challenges with interprofessional collaboration and discharge in GIM. These findings have implications for medical education, workplace learning, patient safety and quality improvement.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPatient DischargeAnthropology, CulturalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleNegotiatingHealth services researchMedical education-practice-based learningQualitative researchQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID25869018
PMCPMC4579221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.