Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25868977›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Triple negative breast cancers comprise a highly tumorigenic cell subpopulation detectable by its high responsiveness to a Sox2 regulatory region 2 (SRR2) reporter.

Karen Jung, Nidhi Gupta, Peng Wang, Jamie T Lewis, Keshav Gopal, Fang Wu, Xiaoxia Ye, Abdulraheem Alshareef, Bassam S Abdulkarim, Donna N Douglas and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulation of cancer stem cells in triple negative breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Linking Pluripotency Reprogramming and Cancer.Stem cells translational medicine · 2017
    Article
  16. Paradoxical role of SOX2 in gastric cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. NONO Is a Negative Regulator ofCancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen JungDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nidhi GuptaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Peng WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jamie T LewisDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Keshav GopalDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Fang WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Xiaoxia YeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abdulraheem AlshareefDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Bassam S AbdulkarimDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Donna N DouglasDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Norman M KnetemanDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Raymond LaiDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently described a novel phenotypic dichotomy within estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells; the cell subset responsive to a Sox2 regulatory region (SRR2) reporter (RR cells) are significantly more tumorigenic than the reporter unresponsive (RU) cells. Here, we report that a similar phenomenon also exists in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), with RR cells more tumorigenic than RU cells. First, examination of all 3 TNBC cell lines stably infected with the SRR2 reporter revealed the presence of a cell subset exhibiting reporter activity. Second, RU and RR cells purified by flow cytometry showed that RR cells expressed higher levels of CD44, generated more spheres in a limiting dilution mammosphere formation assay, and formed larger and more complex structures in Matrigel. Third, within the CD44(High)/CD24- tumor-initiating cell population derived from MDA-MB-231, RR cells were significantly more tumorigenic than RU cells in an in vivo SCID/Beige xenograft mouse model. Examination of 4 TNBC tumors from patients also revealed the presence of a RR cell subset, ranging from 1.1-3.8%. To conclude, we described a novel phenotypic heterogeneity within TNBC, and the SRR2 reporter responsiveness is a useful marker for identifying a highly tumorigenic cell subset within the CD44(High)/CD24-tumor-initiating cell population.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD24 AntigenCell Line, TumorFemaleHeterograftsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMiceMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factorsbreast cancerSox2SRR2tumour cell heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID25868977
PMCPMC4496361
OpenAlexW1542528713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.