Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25868965›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2015

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy with radiation for node-positive vulvar cancer: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis.

Beant S Gill, Mark E Bernard, Jeff F Lin, Goundappa K Balasubramani, Malolan S Rajagopalan, Paniti Sukumvanich, Thomas C Krivak, Alexander B Olawaiye, Joseph L Kelley, Sushil Beriwal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. [Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and vulvar cancer].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancer of the vulva: 2025 update: FIGO Cancer Report 2025.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus technical guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 2: radiotherapy recommendations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  18. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Beant S GillDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mark E BernardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeff F LinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Goundappa K BalasubramaniDepartment of Epidemiology, Epidemiology Data Center, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Malolan S RajagopalanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Paniti SukumvanichDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Thomas C KrivakDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexander B OlawaiyeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joseph L KelleyDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sushil BeriwalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: beriwals@upmc.edu.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USMagee-Womens Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWestern Pennsylvania Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor node-positive vulvar cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy has an established benefit, whereas the impact of chemotherapy is unknown. A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis was conducted to determine patterns of care and evaluate the survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThe NCDB was queried for vulvar cancer patients diagnosed from 1998-2011 who underwent extirpative surgery with confirmed inguinal nodal involvement treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients with inadequate follow-up or non-squamous histologies were excluded. Chi-square test, logistic regression analysis, log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional regression modeling with adjustment using propensity score with inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) were conducted to establish factors associated with utilization and survival.

resultsA total of 1797 patients were identified: 26.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 76.6% had 1-3 involved lymph nodes. Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased over time, from 10.8% in 1998 to 41.0% in 2006 (p<0.001). Lower utilization was seen in older patients, Northeast or Southern facilities, and patients with more extensive nodal dissection, whereas greater number of involved nodes, stage IVA disease and positive surgical margins led to a higher probability of receiving chemotherapy. Unadjusted median survival without and with adjuvant chemotherapy was 29.7months and 44.0months (p=0.001). On IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional regression modeling, delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a 38% reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79, p<0.001).

conclusionIn a large population-based analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in mortality risk for node-positive vulvar cancer patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesVulvar NeoplasmsYoung AdultAdjuvantChemotherapyNCDBNode positiveVulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID25868965
OpenAlexW1985904941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.