Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2015
Changes in Keratocyte Density and Visual Function Five Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome.
Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Seven-year corneal densitometry changes after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
- Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical study on combining femtosecond thin- flap and LASIK with the Triple-A profile for high myopia correction.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Changes in the anterior cornea during the early stages of severe myopia prior to and following LASIK, as detected by confocal microscopy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effects of keratocyte loss on optical properties and vision after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the flap created with a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome.
designRandomized clinical paired-eye study.
methodsBoth eyes of 21 patients received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism. One eye of each patient was randomized by ocular dominance to flap creation with a femtosecond laser and the other eye to flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome. Before LASIK and at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years after LASIK, keratocyte density was measured using confocal microscopy, and high-contrast visual acuity and anterior corneal wavefront aberrations were measured by standard methods. At each visit, all variables were compared between methods of creating the flap and to the same variable before treatment using paired tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsKeratocyte density in the flap decreased by 20% during the first year after LASIK and remained low through 5 years (P < .001). High-order wavefront aberrations increased and uncorrected visual acuity improved immediately after surgery, but these variables did not change further to 5 years. There were no differences in any variables between treatments.
conclusionsA sustained reduction in keratocyte density does not affect vision or optical properties of the cornea through 5 years after LASIK. The method of creating a LASIK flap does not influence the changes in keratocyte density in the flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.