ArticleMutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis2015
Induction of Pig-a mutant erythrocytes in male and female rats exposed to 1,3-propane sultone, ethyl carbamate, or thiotepa.
Article in Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standard protocol for the PIGRET assay, a high-throughput reticulocyte Pig-a assay with an immunomagnetic separation, used in the interlaboratory trial organized by the Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021Article
- Standard protocol for the total red blood cellGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Validation of the Pig-a gene mutation assay has been based mainly on studies in male rodents. To determine if the mutagen-induced responses of the X-linked Pig-a gene differ in females compared to males, groups of five male and female Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to the mutagens 1,3-propane sultone (80mg/kg/day), ethyl carbamate (600mg/kg/day), or thiotepa (7.5mg/kg/day) for three consecutive days (study days 1-3). Pig-a mutant phenotype reticulocyte (RET(CD59-)) and mutant phenotype erythrocyte (RBC(CD59-)) frequencies were determined on study days -4, 15, 30 and 46 using immunomagnetic separation in conjunction with flow cytometric analysis (In Vivo MutaFlow(®)). While the percentage of reticulocytes (%RET) was markedly higher for pre-treatment blood samples from males compared to females (6.6% vs. 3.5%), this sex effect was slight or nonexistent at later time points. Treatment-related effects to %RET were generally modest owing to the 12-day interval between last exposure and blood sampling. Mean RET(CD59-) and RBC(CD59-) frequencies were consistently low in vehicle control animals of both sexes, with 77% of samples exhibiting mutant cell frequencies ≤1×10(-6) over study days 15-46. Treatment with each mutagen caused significant increases to mean RET(CD59-) and RBC(CD59-) frequencies. Whereas genotoxicant-induced RET(CD59-) values were maximal on day 15, induced RBC(CD59-) frequencies were highest at the last sampling time. Sex did not affect 1,3-propane sultone- or thiotepa-induced mutant cell frequencies. While ethyl carbamate-exposed females exhibited higher mean mutant cell frequencies compared to like-treated males, statistical significance was achieved only for RBC(CD59-) at one time point (7.6±1.0×10(-6) compared to 4.7±0.6×10(-6) on day 30). Thus, while some quantitative differences were evident, there were no qualitative differences in how males and females responded to three diverse mutagens. These data support the use of both sexes for Pig-a gene mutation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.