Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867956›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

A comparative analysis of recombinant protein expression in different biofactories: bacteria, insect cells and plant systems.

Elisa Gecchele, Matilde Merlin, Annalisa Brozzetti, Alberto Falorni, Mario Pezzotti, Linda Avesani

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials meet skin tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Indolamine accumulation andFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transient Expression of Dengue Virus NS1 Antigen inFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  16. Plant-Made Bet v 1 for Molecular Diagnosis.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa GeccheleDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Matilde MerlinDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Annalisa BrozzettiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alberto FalorniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Mario PezzottiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Linda AvesaniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; linda.avesani@univr.it.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based systems are considered a valuable platform for the production of recombinant proteins as a result of their well-documented potential for the flexible, low-cost production of high-quality, bioactive products. In this study, we compared the expression of a target human recombinant protein in traditional fermenter-based cell cultures (bacterial and insect) with plant-based expression systems, both transient and stable. For each platform, we described the set-up, optimization and length of the production process, the final product quality and the yields and we evaluated provisional production costs, specific for the selected target recombinant protein. Overall, our results indicate that bacteria are unsuitable for the production of the target protein due to its accumulation within insoluble inclusion bodies. On the other hand, plant-based systems are versatile platforms that allow the production of the selected protein at lower-costs than Baculovirus/insect cell system. In particular, stable transgenic lines displayed the highest-yield of the final product and transient expressing plants the fastest process development. However, not all recombinant proteins may benefit from plant-based systems but the best production platform should be determined empirically with a case-by-case approach, as described here.

Indexed as

AnimalsBaculoviridaeBiotechnologyEscherichia coliGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansNicotianaPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant ProteinsSf9 CellsSpodopteraGlutamate Decarboxylaseglutamate decarboxylase 2Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25867956
PMCPMC4401374
OpenAlexW2091970515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.