Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867848›Full record

ArticleNature methods2015

Rapid reverse genetic screening using CRISPR in zebrafish.

Arish N Shah, Crystal F Davey, Alex C Whitebirch, Adam C Miller, Cecilia B Moens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Versatile CRISPR-Cas Tools for Gene Regulation in Zebrafish via an Enhanced Q Binary System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human-specific gene expansions contribute to brain evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. CCSer2 gates dynein activity at the cell periphery.The Journal of cell biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A Novel Role for Coilin in Vertebrate Innate Immunity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arish N ShahDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Crystal F DaveyDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alex C WhitebirchDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Adam C MillerDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cecilia B MoensDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of Tangential Neuron MigrationR01NS082567 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MOENS, CECILIA B · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
TILLING the Zebrafish Genome: A Reverse Genetics ApproachR01HD076585 · NICHD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MOENS, CECILIA B, SOLNICAKREZEL, LILIANNA · 2012 to 2014
$1.9M
Molecular mechanisms of electrical synapse formation in vivoR00NS085035 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MILLER, ADAM C · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Identification of genes that regulate electrical synapse formation in vivoR21NS076950 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MOENS, CECILIA B · 2012 to 2013
$475k
Molecular mechanisms of electrical synapse formation in vivoK99NS085035 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MILLER, ADAM C · 2013 to 2014
$180k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076585NICHD NIH HHS R01HD076585NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS085035NINDS NIH HHS K99NS085035NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS085035NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082567NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS076950NINDS NIH HHS R21NS076950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying genes involved in biological processes is critical for understanding the molecular building blocks of life. We used engineered CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) to efficiently mutate specific loci in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and screen for genes involved in vertebrate biological processes. We found that increasing CRISPR efficiency by injecting optimized amounts of Cas9-encoding mRNA and multiplexing single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) allowed for phenocopy of known mutants across many phenotypes in embryos. We performed a proof-of-concept screen in which we used intersecting, multiplexed pool injections to examine 48 loci and identified two new genes involved in electrical-synapse formation. By deep sequencing target loci, we found that 90% of the genes were effectively screened. We conclude that CRISPR can be used as a powerful reverse genetic screening strategy in vivo in a vertebrate system.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic LociGenetic TestingPigmentationRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRNA, MessengerZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsRNA, MessengerZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25867848
PMCPMC4667794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.