ArticleProteomics2015
A large-scale proteogenomics study of apicomplexan pathogens-Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum.
Article in Proteomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Proteogenomic Approaches for Mapping the Global Proteome of the Unsequenced Leishmania Vector Phlebotomus papatasi.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Proteomics Applications inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Next-Generation Technologies and Systems Biology for the Design of Novel Vaccines Against Apicomplexan Parasites.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Proteomic Insights into the Biology of the Most Important Foodborne Parasites in Europe.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Genome Wide Identification of Mutational Hotspots in the Apicomplexan Parasite Neospora caninum and the Implications for Virulence.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Proteomics in non-human primates: utilizing RNA-Seq data to improve protein identification by mass spectrometry in vervet monkeys.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Mechanisms and pathways of Toxoplasma gondii transepithelial migration.Tissue barriers · 2017Review
- Canine neosporosis: perspectives on pathogenesis and management.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Review
- Integration of RNA-seq and proteomics data with genomics for improved genome annotation in Apicomplexan parasites.Proteomics · 2015Article
- Construction of an Adenovirus Vaccine Expressing the Cross-reactive Antigen AMA1 forIranian journal of parasitologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteomics data can supplement genome annotation efforts, for example being used to confirm gene models or correct gene annotation errors. Here, we present a large-scale proteogenomics study of two important apicomplexan pathogens: Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum. We queried proteomics data against a panel of official and alternate gene models generated directly from RNASeq data, using several newly generated and some previously published MS datasets for this meta-analysis. We identified a total of 201 996 and 39 953 peptide-spectrum matches for T. gondii and N. caninum, respectively, at a 1% peptide FDR threshold. This equated to the identification of 30 494 distinct peptide sequences and 2921 proteins (matches to official gene models) for T. gondii, and 8911 peptides/1273 proteins for N. caninum following stringent protein-level thresholding. We have also identified 289 and 140 loci for T. gondii and N. caninum, respectively, which mapped to RNA-Seq-derived gene models used in our analysis and apparently absent from the official annotation (release 10 from EuPathDB) of these species. We present several examples in our study where the RNA-Seq evidence can help in correction of the current gene model and can help in discovery of potential new genes. The findings of this study have been integrated into the EuPathDB. The data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD000297and PXD000298.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.