Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867675›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2015

Transferability and generalizability of regression models of ultrafine particles in urban neighborhoods in the Boston area.

Allison P Patton, Wig Zamore, Elena N Naumova, Jonathan I Levy, Doug Brugge, John L Durant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SatHealth: A Multimodal Public Health Dataset with Satellite-based Environmental Factors.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolomic assessment of exposure to near-highway ultrafine particles.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  18. On the Need for Better Exposure Assessment for Air Pollution with High Spatial and Temporal Variation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison P Patton†Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.
Wig Zamore‡Somerville Transportation Equity Partnership, Somerville, Massachusetts 02143, United States.
Elena N Naumova†Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.
Jonathan I Levy§Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States.
Doug Brugge∥Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.
John L Durant†Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.

Funding

Training Grant for the Joint Graduate Program in Exposure Science.T32ES019854 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI MAINELIS, GEDIMINAS, WEISEL, CLIFFORD P · 2011 to 2020
$2.6M
Community Assessment of Freeway Pollution and HealthR01ES015462 · NIEHS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI BRUGGE, DOUG · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES015462NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015462NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES019854NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES198543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use regression (LUR) models have been used to assess air pollutant exposure, but limited evidence exists on whether location-specific LUR models are applicable to other locations (transferability) or general models are applicable to smaller areas (generalizability). We tested transferability and generalizability of spatial-temporal LUR models of hourly particle number concentration (PNC) for Boston-area (MA, U.S.A.) urban neighborhoods near Interstate 93. Four neighborhood-specific regression models and one Boston-area model were developed from mobile monitoring measurements (34-46 days/neighborhood over one year each). Transferability was tested by applying each neighborhood-specific model to the other neighborhoods; generalizability was tested by applying the Boston-area model to each neighborhood. Both the transferability and generalizability of models were tested with and without neighborhood-specific calibration. Important PNC predictors (adjusted-R(2) = 0.24-0.43) included wind speed and direction, temperature, highway traffic volume, and distance from the highway edge. Direct model transferability was poor (R(2) < 0.17). Locally-calibrated transferred models (R(2) = 0.19-0.40) and the Boston-area model (adjusted-R(2) = 0.26, range: 0.13-0.30) performed similarly to neighborhood-specific models; however, some coefficients of locally calibrated transferred models were uninterpretable. Our results show that transferability of neighborhood-specific LUR models of hourly PNC was limited, but that a general model performed acceptably in multiple areas when calibrated with local data.

Indexed as

Air MovementsAir PollutionBostonEnvironmental MonitoringModels, StatisticalParticulate MatterParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID25867675
PMCPMC4440409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.