Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867560›Full record

ArticleThe West Indian medical journal2014

3Ps--Pharmacist, Physician and Patient: Proposal for Joint Cooperation to Increase Adherence to Medication.

M Leppée, J Culig, K Mandic, M Eric

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The West Indian medical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M LeppéeDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Andrija Stampar Institute of Public Health, Mirogojska 16, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. marcel.leppee@stampar.hr.
J CuligDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Andrija Stampar Institute of Public Health, Mirogojska 16, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
K MandicUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
M EricDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 1-3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOlder people receive medications for chronic diseases and therefore adherence is an important health and economic concern. The objective of the study is to determine relationships between pharmacist, patient and patient's family physician with special emphasis on the comparison of adherent and non-adherent patients.

methodsThe study was designed as a cross-sectional survey by use of a self-administered 33-item questionnaire. The study included 635 individuals collecting or buying drugs for the treatment of chronic diseases and 84 pharmacists dispensing drugs for chronic diseases to patients.

resultsThe study included 265 (41.7%) adherent and 370 (58.3%) non-adherent patients. Comparison of particular answers between patients and pharmacists revealed a discrepancy, with a significant difference in five of eight answers. The highest difference was recorded in answers to the question whether a pharmacist offered thorough advice to the patient on how to take the drug; an affirmative answer to this question was given by 90.5% of pharmacists and only 57.2% of patients. The analysis of respondents' claims about their relation with one doctor shows that in the first place, with the highest number of positive responses, is the claim of the respondents that their doctor always explains the results of laboratory tests and other specialized findings (n = 489, 77.0%).

conclusionEnhancing communication between the physician, the pharmacist and the patient is a key in boosting the patient's ability to follow a medication regimen. Pharmacist-physician-patient relationship can improve adherence to medication. It is very important to empower pharmacists to offer and allow time for patient counselling.

Identifiers

PMID25867560
PMCPMC4668963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.