Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2015
Rapid response in psychological treatments for binge eating disorder.
Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Dropout, Outcome, and Relapse in Web-Based Guided Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Enhanced Among Patients With Binge-Eating Disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Trial
- Mechanisms of Change in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Binge-Eating Disorder: A Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling Approach.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Trial
- Rapid response to behavioral/pharmacological obesity treatments for binge-eating disorder predicts better clinical outcomes.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Trial
- The feasibility of a binge eating intervention in Black women with obesity.Eating behaviors · 2018Trial
- An adaptive randomized trial of dialectical behavior therapy and cognitive behavior therapy for binge-eating.Psychological medicine · 2017Trial
- Psychotherapies for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Review
- Metacognition and emotion regulation as treatment targets in binge eating disorder: a network analysis study.Journal of eating disorders · 2021Article
- Interrelations between participant and intervention characteristics, process variables and outcomes in online interventions: A protocol for overarching analyses within and across seven clinical trials in ICare.Internet interventions · 2019Article
- Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives.Psychology research and behavior management · 2018Review
- Article
- Review
- New Horizons in Measurement: a Review of Novel and Innovative Approaches to Eating-Disorder Assessment.Current psychiatry reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAnalysis of short- and long-term effects of rapid response across 3 different treatments for binge eating disorder (BED).
methodIn a randomized clinical study comparing interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help (CBTgsh), and behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatment in 205 adults meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; APA, 1994) criteria for BED, the predictive value of rapid response, defined as ≥70% reduction in binge eating by Week 4, was determined for remission from binge eating and global eating disorder psychopathology at posttreatment, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups.
resultsRapid responders in CBTgsh, but not in IPT or BWL, showed significantly greater rates of remission from binge eating than nonrapid responders, which was sustained over the long term. Rapid and nonrapid responders in IPT and rapid responders in CBTgsh showed a greater remission from binge eating than nonrapid responders in CBTgsh and BWL. Rapid responders in CBTgsh showed greater remission from binge eating than rapid responders in BWL. Although rapid responders in all treatments had lower global eating disorder psychopathology than nonrapid responders in the short term, rapid responders in CBTgsh and IPT were more improved than those in BWL and nonrapid responders in each treatment. Rapid responders in BWL did not differ from nonrapid responders in CBTgsh and IPT.
conclusionRapid response is a treatment-specific positive prognostic indicator of sustained remission from binge eating in CBTgsh. Regarding an evidence-based, stepped-care model, IPT, equally efficacious for rapid and nonrapid responders, could be investigated as a second-line treatment in case of nonrapid response to first-line CBTgsh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.