Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867216›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Electroretinogram analysis of the visual response in zebrafish larvae.

Jared D Chrispell, Tatiana I Rebrik, Ellen R Weiss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging Zebrafish to Study Retinal Degenerations.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  10. The occhiolino (occ) mutant Zebrafish, a model for development of the optical function in the biological lens.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jared D ChrispellDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Tatiana I RebrikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University.
Ellen R WeissDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; erweiss@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

The Role of Phosphorylation in Photoreceptor Cell BiologyR21EY019758 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WEISS, ELLEN RUTH · 2009 to 2010
$405k
Function and Regulation of PKA-mediated GRK Phosphorylation in PhotoreceptorsF32EY022279 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHRISPELL, JARED DAVID · 2012 to 2013
$106k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY022279NEI NIH HHS R21 EY019758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroretinogram (ERG) is a noninvasive electrophysiological method for determining retinal function. Through the placement of an electrode on the surface of the cornea, electrical activity generated in response to light can be measured and used to assess the activity of retinal cells in vivo. This manuscript describes the use of the ERG to measure visual function in zebrafish. Zebrafish have long been utilized as a model for vertebrate development due to the ease of gene suppression by morpholino oligonucleotides and pharmacological manipulation. At 5-10 dpf, only cones are functional in the larval retina. Therefore, the zebrafish, unlike other animals, is a powerful model system for the study of cone visual function in vivo. This protocol uses standard anesthesia, micromanipulation and stereomicroscopy protocols that are common in laboratories that perform zebrafish research. The outlined methods make use of standard electrophysiology equipment and a low light camera to guide the placement of the recording microelectrode onto the larval cornea. Finally, we demonstrate how a commercially available ERG stimulator/recorder originally designed for use with mice can easily be adapted for use with zebrafish. ERG of larval zebrafish provides an excellent method of assaying cone visual function in animals that have been modified by morpholino oligonucleotide injection as well as newer genome engineering techniques such as Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9, all of which have greatly increased the efficiency and efficacy of gene targeting in zebrafish. In addition, we take advantage of the ability of pharmacological agents to penetrate zebrafish larvae to evaluate the molecular components that contribute to the photoresponse. This protocol outlines a setup that can be modified and used by researchers with various experimental goals.

Indexed as

AnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsElectroretinographyLarvaVision, OcularZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25867216
PMCPMC4401321
OpenAlexW1998140065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.