Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867139›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2015

Randomized phase II/III clinical trial of elpamotide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: PEGASUS-PC Study.

Hiroki Yamaue, Takuya Tsunoda, Masaji Tani, Motoki Miyazawa, Kenji Yamao, Nobumasa Mizuno, Takuji Okusaka, Hideki Ueno, Narikazu Boku, Akira Fukutomi and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Tumor vaccines: Toward multidimensional anti-tumor therapies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hiroki YamaueSecond Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takuya TsunodaSecond Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masaji TaniSecond Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Motoki MiyazawaSecond Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kenji YamaoDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Nobumasa MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Takuji OkusakaHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Division National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki UenoHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Division National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Gastroenterology Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Akira FukutomiDepartment of Gastroenterology Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroshi IshiiHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Division Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichi OhkawaHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masayuki FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MaguchiCenter for Gastroenterology Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masafumi IkedaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Yosuke TogashiDept Genome Biology Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuto NishioDept Genome Biology Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuo OhashiDepartment of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable society Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gemcitabine is a key drug for the treatment of pancreatic cancer; however, with its limitation in clinical benefits, the development of another potent therapeutic is necessary. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 is an essential target for tumor angiogenesis, and we have conducted a phase I clinical trial using gemcitabine and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 peptide (elpamotide). Based on the promising results of this phase I trial, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II/III clinical trial has been carried out for pancreatic cancer. The eligibility criteria included locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients were assigned to either the Active group (elpamotide + gemcitabine) or Placebo group (placebo + gemcitabine) in a 2:1 ratio by the dynamic allocation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The Harrington-Fleming test was applied to the statistical analysis in this study to evaluate the time-lagged effect of immunotherapy appropriately. A total of 153 patients (Active group, n = 100; Placebo group, n = 53) were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the prolongation of overall survival (Harrington-Fleming P-value, 0.918; log-rank P-value, 0.897; hazard ratio, 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.486-1.557). Median survival time was 8.36 months (95% CI, 7.46-10.18) for the Active group and 8.54 months (95% CI, 7.33-10.84) for the Placebo group. The toxicity observed in both groups was manageable. Combination therapy of elpamotide with gemcitabine was well tolerated. Despite the lack of benefit in overall survival, subgroup analysis suggested that the patients who experienced severe injection site reaction, such as ulceration and erosion, might have better survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, AdenosquamousDeoxycytidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGemcitabineHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPeptide Fragmentsarginyl-phenylalanyl-valyl-prolyl-aspartyl-glycyl-asparagyl-arginyl-isoleucineCancer VaccinesDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePeptide FragmentsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Advanced pancreatic cancerelpamotideimmunotherapypeptide vaccinephase II/III

Identifiers

PMID25867139
PMCPMC4520640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.