Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25867100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative analysis of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of (Populus simonii × P. nigra) × (P. nigra × P. simonii) hybrid clones of different ploidides.

Xiyang Zhao, Ying Li, Mi Zheng, Xiuyan Bian, Mengran Liu, Yanshuang Sun, Jing Jiang, Fuwei Wang, Shuchun Li, Yonghong Cui and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapeseed (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Photosynthesis-Related Responses of Colombian ElitePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiyang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China; Seed Orchard of Siping, Siping, 136000, China.
Ying LiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Mi ZhengState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Xiuyan BianState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Mengran LiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Yanshuang SunState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Jing JiangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Fuwei WangTree Seedling Management Station, Forestry Department of Jilin Province, Changchun, 130000, China.
Shuchun LiTree Seedling Management Station, Forestry Department of Jilin Province, Changchun, 130000, China.
Yonghong CuiSeed Orchard of Siping, Siping, 136000, China.
Guifeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Chuanping YangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate differences among poplar clones of various ploidies, 12 hybrid poplar clones (P. simonii × P. nigra) × (P. nigra × P. simonii) with different ploidies were used to study phenotypic variation in growth traits and photosynthetic characteristics. Analysis of variance showed remarkable differences for each of the investigated traits among these clones (P < 0.01). Coefficients of phenotypic variation (PCV) ranged from 2.38% to 56.71%, and repeatability ranged from 0.656 to 0.987. The Pn (photosynthetic rate) photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) curves of the 12 clones were S-shaped, but the Pn-ambient CO2 (Ca) curves were shaped like an inverted "V". The stomatal conductance (Gs)-PPFD and transpiration rate (Tr)-PPFD curves had an upward tendency; however, with increasing PFFD, the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci)-PPFD curves had a downward tendency in all of the clones. The Pn-PPFD and Pn-Ca curves followed the pattern of a quadratic equation. The average light saturation point and light compensation point of the triploid clones were the highest and lowest, respectively, among the three types of clones. For Pn-Ca curves, diploid clones had a higher average CO2 saturation point and average CO2 compensation point compared with triploid and tetraploid clones. Correlation analyses indicated that all investigated traits were strongly correlated with each other. In future studies, molecular methods should be used to analyze poplar clones of different ploidies to improve our understanding of the growth and development mechanisms of polyploidy.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPhotosynthesisPloidiesChlorophyllFluorescenceModels, BiologicalPopulusChlorophyll

Identifiers

PMID25867100
PMCPMC4395098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.