Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866597›Full record

ArticleChemosensory perception2014

Sensitivity and Specificity of Self-Reported Olfactory Function in a Home-Based Study of Independent-Living, Healthy Older Women.

Shristi Rawal, Howard J Hoffman, Audrey K Chapo, Valerie B Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemosensory perception, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Assessment and behavioural management options for older adults with declined smell and taste functions: a scoping review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Age-related decrease of odorant sensitivity for a selection of nine diverse molecules.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Influences of Age, Sex and Smoking Habit on Flavor Recognition in Healthy Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Epidemiology of Olfactory Disorders.Current otorhinolaryngology reports · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shristi RawalDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut-UCONN, 358 Mansfield Road, Box U1101, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.
Howard J HoffmanEpidemiology & Statistics Program, Division of Scientific Programs, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Suite 8300, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-9670, USA.
Audrey K ChapoDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut-UCONN, 358 Mansfield Road, Box U1101, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.
Valerie B DuffyDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut-UCONN, 358 Mansfield Road, Box U1101, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.

Funding

NIDCD NIH HHS Y01 DC000013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 2011-14 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey chemosensory protocol asks adults to self-rate their orthonasal (via nostrils) and retronasal (via mouth) smell abilities for subsequent odor identification testing. From data collected with a similar protocol, we aimed to identify a self-reported olfactory index that showed the best sensitivity (correctly identifying dysfunction) and specificity (correctly indentifying normosmia) with measured olfaction.

methodsIn home-based testing, 121 independent-living older women (age 73±7 years) reported their olfactory function by interviewer-administered survey. Olfactory function was measured orthonasally via composite (odor threshold, identification task) or identification task alone.

resultsOnly 16 % of women self-rated "below average" smell function. More women perceived loss of smell (38 %) or flavor (30 %) with aging. The rate of measured dysfunction was 30 % by composite (threshold and identification) and 21.5 % by identification task, the latter misclassifying some mild dysfunction as normosmia. An index of self-rated smell function and perceived loss yielded the most favorable sensitivity (65 %) and specificity (77 %) to measured function. Self-rated olfaction showed better agreement with severe measured dysfunction; mild dysfunction was less noticed.

conclusionsSelf-reported indices that query about current and perceived changes in smell and flavor with aging showed better sensitivity estimates than those previously reported. Specificity was somewhat lower-some older adults may correctly perceive loss unidentified in a single assessment, or have a retronasal impairment that was undetected by an orthonasal measure. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings should inform self-rated measures that screen for severe olfactory dysfunction in clinical/community settings where testing is not routine.

Indexed as

AgingFemalesHealth statusOdor identificationOdor thresholdSmell

Identifiers

PMID25866597
PMCPMC4392851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.