Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866527›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2015

Proteomic analysis of serum from patients with major depressive disorder to compare their depressive and remission statuses.

Jiyeong Lee, Eun-Jeong Joo, Hee-Joung Lim, Jong-Moon Park, Kyu Young Lee, Arum Park, AeEun Seok, HooKeun Lee, Hee-Gyoo Kang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Peripheral Markers of Depression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiyeong LeeDepartment of Senior Healthcare, BK21 Plus Program, Graduate School, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Jeong JooDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Joung LimLaboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Division of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Moon ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Young LeeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Arum ParkDepartment of Senior Healthcare, BK21 Plus Program, Graduate School, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
AeEun SeokDepartment of Senior Healthcare, BK21 Plus Program, Graduate School, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
HooKeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Gyoo KangDepartment of Senior Healthcare, BK21 Plus Program, Graduate School, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. ; Institute for Senior Industry, Eulji University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. ; Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Graduate School of Health Science, Eulji University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Eulji University · KRGachon University · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrently, there are a few biological markers to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of depression. However, it is not sufficient for diagnosis. We attempted to identify differentially expressed proteins during depressive moods as putative diagnostic biomarkers by using quantitative proteomic analysis of serum.

methodsBlood samples were collected twice from five patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at depressive status before treatment and at remission status during treatment. Samples were individually analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for protein profiling. Differentially expressed proteins were analyzed by label-free quantification. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the differentially expressed proteins. For validation, 8 patients with MDD including 3 additional patients and 8 matched normal controls were analyzed.

resultsThe quantitative proteomic studies identified 10 proteins that were consistently upregulated or downregulated in 5 MDD patients. ELISA yielded results consistent with the proteomic analysis for 3 proteins. Expression levels were significantly different between normal controls and MDD patients. The 3 proteins were ceruloplasmin, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 and complement component 1qC, which were upregulated during the depressive status. The depressive status could be distinguished from the euthymic status from the ROC curves for these proteins, and this discrimination was enhanced when all 3 proteins were analyzed together.

conclusionThis is the first proteomic study in MDD patients to compare intra-individual differences dependent on mood. This technique could be a useful approach to identify MDD biomarkers, but requires additional proteomic studies for validation.

Indexed as

BiomarkerInflammationMajor depressive disorderNeurotransmitterProteomics

Identifiers

PMID25866527
PMCPMC4390597
OpenAlexW1974040610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.