ArticleMolecular vision2015
Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling.
Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in the Effect of Dopamine on the Phototransduction Between Lampreys and Jawed Vertebrates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- cAMP-Mediated Modulation of Functions of Green- and Blue-Sensitive Cones in Zebrafish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Dyschromatopsia: a comprehensive analysis of mechanisms and cutting-edge treatments for color vision deficiency.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Analysis of dim-light responses in rod and cone photoreceptors with altered calcium kinetics.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- A Simplified Model of Activation and Deactivation of Human Rod Phototransduction-An Electroretinographic Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Adaptation memory in photoreceptors: different mechanisms in rods and cones.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Phototransduction in Anuran Green Rods: Origins of Extra-Sensitivity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Analysis of waveform and amplitude of mouse rod and cone flash responses.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Rhodopsin-mediated light-off-induced protein kinase A activation in mouse rod photoreceptor cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Visual cells and visual pigments of the river lamprey revisited.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Article
- Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Elevated cAMP improves signal-to-noise ratio in amphibian rod photoreceptors.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- Origins of the phototransduction delay as inferred from stochastic and deterministic simulation of the amplification cascade.Molecular vision · 2017Article
- Quantitative modeling of the molecular steps underlying shut-off of rhodopsin activity in rod phototransduction.Molecular vision · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods.
methodsElectrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca2+ concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca2+ feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step.
resultsJudging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell's volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca2+-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca2+ feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for "best" Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods.
conclusionsThe main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones' ability to terminate their photoresponse faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25866462PMC4392649W2130293499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.