Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866462›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2015

Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling.

Luba Astakhova, Michael Firsov, Victor Govardovskii

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phototransduction in Anuran Green Rods: Origins of Extra-Sensitivity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rhodopsin-mediated light-off-induced protein kinase A activation in mouse rod photoreceptor cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Visual cells and visual pigments of the river lamprey revisited.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luba AstakhovaInstitute for Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Michael FirsovInstitute for Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Victor GovardovskiiInstitute for Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods.

methodsElectrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca2+ concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca2+ feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step.

resultsJudging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell's volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca2+-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca2+ feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for "best" Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods.

conclusionsThe main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones' ability to terminate their photoresponse faster.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCarpsCyclic GMPKineticsLightLight Signal TransductionMembrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalOrgan SpecificityPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesPhotochemical ProcessesRana ridibundaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsCalciumCyclic GMPPhosphoric Diester Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID25866462
PMCPMC4392649
OpenAlexW2130293499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.