ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015
A transcriptomic-phylogenomic analysis of the evolutionary relationships of flatworms.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns and determinants of mitogenomic evolution in Bilateria.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From Rigid Order to Radical Variation: Mitogenome Evolution in the Main Lineages of a Lesser-Known Animal Phylum (Gastrotricha).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Synonymous but not silent: functional codon bias reveals decoupled mitonuclear evolution in parasitic worms.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic history of the acquisition of molluscan hosts in acotylean flatworms.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Evolutionary History of Bilaterian FoxP Genes: Complex Ancestral Functions and Evolutionary Changes Spanning 2R-WGD in the Vertebrate Lineage.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evidence for Multiple Independent Expansions of Fox Gene Families Within Flatworms.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
- Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Mining differentially expressed genes during paratomy in the transcriptome of the flatworm Stenostomum leucops.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CRISPR-based functional genomics for schistosomes and related flatworms.Trends in parasitology · 2024Review
- A comparative analysis of planarian genomes reveals regulatory conservation in the face of rapid structural divergence.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Ultrastructural analysis and 3D reconstruction of the frontal sensory-glandular complex and its neural projections in the platyhelminth Macrostomum lignano.Cell and tissue research · 2024Article
- Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Evolution and Function of the Notch Signaling Pathway: An Invertebrate Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Female Germline Cysts in Animals: Evolution and Function.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Review
- Transitions and trade-offs in regeneration.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of whole-body regeneration across planarian flatworms.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Patterns of host-parasite associations between marine meiofaunal flatworms (Platyhelminthes) and rhytidocystids (Apicomplexa).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Convergent evolution of the sensory pits in and within flatworms.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial phylogenomics provides conclusive evidence that the family Ancyrocephalidae is deeply paraphyletic.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- A phylogenomic approach to resolving interrelationships of polyclad flatworms, with implications for life-history evolution.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interrelationships of the flatworms (phylum Platyhelminthes) are poorly resolved despite decades of morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies. The earliest-branching clades (Catenulida, Macrostomorpha, and Polycladida) share spiral cleavage and entolecithal eggs with other lophotrochozoans. Lecithoepitheliata have primitive spiral cleavage but derived ectolecithal eggs. Other orders (Rhabdocoela, Proseriata, Tricladida and relatives, and Bothrioplanida) all have derived ectolecithal eggs but have uncertain affinities to one another. The orders of parasitic Neodermata emerge from an uncertain position from within these ectolecithal classes. To tackle these problems, we have sequenced transcriptomes from 18 flatworms and 5 other metazoan groups. The addition of published data produces an alignment of >107,000 amino acids with less than 28% missing data from 27 flatworm taxa in 11 orders covering all major clades. Our phylogenetic analyses show that Platyhelminthes consist of the two clades Catenulida and Rhabditophora. Within Rhabditophora, we show the earliest-emerging branch is Macrostomorpha, not Polycladida. We show Lecithoepitheliata are not members of Neoophora but are sister group of Polycladida, implying independent origins of the ectolecithal eggs found in Lecithoepitheliata and Neoophora. We resolve Rhabdocoela as the most basally branching euneoophoran taxon. Tricladida, Bothrioplanida, and Neodermata constitute a group that appears to have lost both spiral cleavage and centrosomes. We identify Bothrioplanida as the long-sought closest free-living sister group of the parasitic Neodermata. Among parasitic orders, we show that Cestoda are closer to Trematoda than to Monogenea, rejecting the concept of the Cercomeromorpha. Our results have important implications for understanding the evolution of this major phylum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.