Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866392›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

A transcriptomic-phylogenomic analysis of the evolutionary relationships of flatworms.

Bernhard Egger, François Lapraz, Bartłomiej Tomiczek, Steven Müller, Christophe Dessimoz, Johannes Girstmair, Nives Škunca, Kate A Rawlinson, Christopher B Cameron, Elena Beli and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Female Germline Cysts in Animals: Evolution and Function.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  15. Transitions and trade-offs in regeneration.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bernhard EggerDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
François LaprazDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Bartłomiej TomiczekDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Steven MüllerDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christophe DessimozDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Johannes GirstmairDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nives ŠkuncaETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Universitätsstrasse 19, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Kate A RawlinsonDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christopher B CameronUniversité de Montréal, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Elena BeliUniversité de Montréal, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada; Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed Ambientali, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
M Antonio TodaroUniversità degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 213/d, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Mehrez GammoudiUniversité Tunis El-Manar Campus Universitaire, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia.
Carolina NoreñaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Maximilian J TelfordDepartment Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: m.telford@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H006966/1European Research Council 322790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interrelationships of the flatworms (phylum Platyhelminthes) are poorly resolved despite decades of morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies. The earliest-branching clades (Catenulida, Macrostomorpha, and Polycladida) share spiral cleavage and entolecithal eggs with other lophotrochozoans. Lecithoepitheliata have primitive spiral cleavage but derived ectolecithal eggs. Other orders (Rhabdocoela, Proseriata, Tricladida and relatives, and Bothrioplanida) all have derived ectolecithal eggs but have uncertain affinities to one another. The orders of parasitic Neodermata emerge from an uncertain position from within these ectolecithal classes. To tackle these problems, we have sequenced transcriptomes from 18 flatworms and 5 other metazoan groups. The addition of published data produces an alignment of >107,000 amino acids with less than 28% missing data from 27 flatworm taxa in 11 orders covering all major clades. Our phylogenetic analyses show that Platyhelminthes consist of the two clades Catenulida and Rhabditophora. Within Rhabditophora, we show the earliest-emerging branch is Macrostomorpha, not Polycladida. We show Lecithoepitheliata are not members of Neoophora but are sister group of Polycladida, implying independent origins of the ectolecithal eggs found in Lecithoepitheliata and Neoophora. We resolve Rhabdocoela as the most basally branching euneoophoran taxon. Tricladida, Bothrioplanida, and Neodermata constitute a group that appears to have lost both spiral cleavage and centrosomes. We identify Bothrioplanida as the long-sought closest free-living sister group of the parasitic Neodermata. Among parasitic orders, we show that Cestoda are closer to Trematoda than to Monogenea, rejecting the concept of the Cercomeromorpha. Our results have important implications for understanding the evolution of this major phylum.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsBiological EvolutionCentromereFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleOvumPlanariansPlatyhelminthsSpermatozoaTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25866392
PMCPMC4446793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.