Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866234›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2015

Determining ethyl glucuronide cutoffs when detecting self-reported alcohol use in addiction treatment patients.

Jessica M Lowe, Michael G McDonell, Emily Leickly, Frank A Angelo, Roger Vilardaga, Sterling McPherson, Debra Srebnik, John Roll, Richard K Ries

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M LoweDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Michael G McDonell
Emily Leickly
Frank A Angelo
Roger Vilardaga
Sterling McPherson
Debra Srebnik
John Roll
Richard K Ries
University of Washington · USWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

Novel EtG BasedContingency Management for Alcohol in the Severely Mentally IllR01AA020248 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCDONELL, MICHAEL G · 2012 to 2021
$4.6M
Innovative Smartphone Application for Quitting Smoking among Seriously Mentally IK99DA037276 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VILARDAGA, ROGER · 2014 to 2015
$344k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020248NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA020248-01NIDA NIH HHS 1K99DA037276-01NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA037276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthyl glucuronide (EtG) is an alcohol biomarker with potential utility as a clinical research and alcohol treatment outcome. Debate exists regarding the appropriate cutoff level for determining alcohol use, particularly with the EtG immunoassay. This study determined the EtG immunoassay cutoff levels that most closely correspond to self-reported drinking in alcohol-dependent outpatients.

methodsEighty adults with alcohol dependence and mental illness, taking part in an alcohol treatment study, provided urine samples 3 times per week for up to 16 weeks (1,589 samples). Self-reported drinking during 120 hours prior to each sample collection was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted to assess the ability of the EtG immunoassay to detect self-reported alcohol use across 24- to 120-hour time periods. Sensitivity and specificity of EtG immunoassay cutoff levels was compared in 100 ng/ml increments (100 to 500 ng/ml) across 24 to 120 hours.

resultsOver half (57%) of the 1,589 samples indicated recent alcohol consumption. The EtG immunoassay closely corresponded to self-reported drinking from 24 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 0.92) to 120 hours (AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.90). When cutoff levels were compared across 24 to 120 hours, 100 ng/ml had the highest sensitivity (0.93 to 0.78) and lowest specificity (0.67 to 0.85). Relative to 100 ng/ml, the 200 ng/ml cutoff demonstrated a reduction in sensitivity (0.89 to 0.67), but improved specificity (0.78 to 0.94). The 300, 400, and 500 ng/ml cutoffs demonstrated the lowest sensitivity (0.86 to 0.33) and highest specificity (0.86 to 0.97) over 24 to 120 hours.

conclusionsFor detecting alcohol use for >24 hours, the 200 ng/ml cutoff level is recommended for use as a research and clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Self ReportAlcohol DrinkingBiomarkersFemaleGlucuronatesHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySubstance Abuse DetectionBiomarkersethyl glucuronideGlucuronatesAlcohol BiomarkersAlcohol TreatmentEthyl GlucuronideUrine Testing

Identifiers

PMID25866234
PMCPMC4400217
OpenAlexW2017917959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.