Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25866126›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2016

Age and sex-specific mortality of wild and captive populations of a monogamous pair-bonded primate (Aotus azarae).

Sam M Larson, Fernando Colchero, Owen R Jones, Lawrence Williams, Eduardo Fernandez-Duque

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sam M LarsonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fernando ColcheroDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Owen R JonesMax-Planck Odense Center on the Biodemography of Aging, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lawrence WilliamsMichael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, Bastrop, Texas.
Eduardo Fernandez-DuqueDepartment of Anthropology, Yale, New Haven, Connecticut.
University of Southern Denmark · DKInstituto de Física del Litoral · ARUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

STATISTICAL DATA ENCLAVE COREP30AG012836 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B, KOHLER, HANS-PETER · 1999 to 2024
$14.0M
Population Science Research Center Development CoreR24HD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SMITH, HERBERT L. · 2003 to 2017
$9.8M
Sci-Tech Core-Population Dynamics Research CenterP2CHD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EMILIO ALBERTO PARRADO · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012836NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD044964NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD044964NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD-044964-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In polygynous primates, a greater reproductive variance in males have been linked to their reduced life expectancy relative to females. The mortality patterns of monogamous pair-bonded primates, however, are less clear. We analyzed the sex differences in mortality within wild (NMales  = 70, NFemales  = 73) and captive (NMales  = 25, NFemales  = 29) populations of Azara's owl monkeys (Aotus azarae), a socially and genetically monogamous primate exhibiting biparental care. We used Bayesian Survival Trajectory Analysis (BaSTA) to test age-dependent models of mortality. The wild and captive populations were best fit by the logistic and Gompertz models, respectively, implying greater heterogeneity in the wild environment likely due to harsher conditions. We found that age patterns of mortality were similar between the sexes in both populations. We calculated life expectancy and disparity, the latter a measure of the steepness of senescence, for both sexes in each population. Males and females had similar life expectancies in both populations; the wild population overall having a shorter life expectancy than the captive one. Furthermore, captive females had a reduced life disparity relative to captive males and to both sexes in the wild. We interpret this pattern in light of the hazards associated with reproduction. In captivity, where reproduction is intensely managed, the risks associated with gestation and birth are tempered so that there is a reduction in the likelihood of captive females dying prematurely, decreasing their overall life disparity.

Indexed as

LongevityAnimalsAnimals, ZooAotidaeArgentinaBayes TheoremFemaleLife ExpectancyMalePair BondReproductionSex CharacteristicsTexasbiparental careKeyfitz' entropylife expectancymonogamypair-bondsenescence

Identifiers

PMID25866126
PMCPMC5611823
OpenAlexW1551618328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.