ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2015
Assessment of the OsteoMark-Navigation System for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019Article
- Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applied in dentistry.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the accuracy of a novel navigation system for maxillofacial surgery using human cadavers and a live minipig model. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe tested an electromagnetic tracking system (OsteoMark-Navigation) that uses simple sensors to determine the position and orientation of a hand-held pencil-like marking device. The device can translate 3-dimensional computed tomographic data intraoperatively to allow the surgeon to localize and draw a proposed osteotomy or the resection margins of a tumor on bone. The accuracy of the OsteoMark-Navigation system in locating and marking osteotomies and screw positions in human cadaver heads was assessed. In group 1 (n = 3, 6 sides), OsteoMark-Navigation marked osteotomies and screw positions were compared to virtual treatment plans. In group 2 (n = 3, 6 sides), marked osteotomies and screw positions for distraction osteogenesis devices were compared with those performed using fabricated guide stents. Three metrics were used to document the precision and accuracy. In group 3 (n = 1), the system was tested in a standard operating room environment.
resultsFor group 1, the mean error between the points was 0.7 mm (horizontal) and 1.7 mm (vertical). Compared with the posterior and inferior mandibular border, the mean error was 1.2 and 1.7 mm, respectively. For group 2, the mean discrepancy between the points marked using the OsteoMark-Navigation system and the surgical guides was 1.9 mm (range 0 to 4.1). The system maintained accuracy on a live minipig in a standard operating room environment.
conclusionBased on this research OsteoMark-Navigation is a potentially powerful tool for clinical use in maxillofacial surgery. It has accuracy and precision comparable to that of existing clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.