Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25865538›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2015

Phenotype-genotype correlations of facial width and height proportions in patients with Class II malocclusion.

L M Moreno Uribe, A Ray, D R Blanchette, D V Dawson, T E Southard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HMGA Genes and Proteins in Development and Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Candidate gene analyses of 3-dimensional dentoalveolar phenotypes in subjects with malocclusion.American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M Moreno UribeDepartment of Orthodontics, Dows Institute for Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
A Ray
D R Blanchette
D V Dawson
T E Southard
University of Iowa · US

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science ProgramUL1TR000442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2012 to 2013
$10.0M
Institutional Training Program in Oral Health ResearchT32DE014678 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SQUIER, CHRISTOPHER · 2002 to 2011
$5.2M
NCATS NIH HHS 2 UL1 TR000442-06NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000442NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE014678PHS HHS T32-DEO14678-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize soft-tissue facial height and width variation in Class II malocclusion and test for correlations with genes HMGA2, AJUBA, and ADK. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Nine facial proportions were estimated from 2D frontal repose photographs of 330 Caucasian adults with Class II malocclusion. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter adjustments for age and gender, the facial proportions were submitted to a principal component analyses (PCA). The most meaningful phenotypic variations were correlated with SNPs rs7924176 (ADK), rs17101923 (HMGA2), and rs997154 (AJUBA) genotyped in 106 individuals.

resultsPrincipal component analyses resulted in four principal components (PCs), which explained 75% of total variation. PC1 captured variation in the intercanthus distance and explained 28% of total variation. PC2 explained 21% of the variations in facial taper and facial index. PC3 explained 14% and reflected variations in the vertical dimension of the lower face. PC4 explained 12% and captured variations in distance between the eyes, width of the commissures, and the length of the superior aspect of the lower face height corresponding to the vertical dimension of the philtrum of the upper lip. A suggestive association (p<0.05) was observed between PC4 and rs997154 corroborating the role of AJUBA in variation of facial dimensions.

conclusion2D frontal photographs can be used to derive quantitative measures of soft-tissue phenotypes that are of clinical relevance. The methods described are suitable for discovery and replication of associations between genotypes and malocclusion phenotypes.

Indexed as

Vertical DimensionAdolescentAdultAnatomic VariationChinEyeFaceFemaleGenotypeHMGA2 ProteinHumansLIM Domain ProteinsLipMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIMandibleAJUBA protein, humanHMGA2 ProteinLIM Domain ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesClass II malocclusionestheticsphenotype-genotype correlations

Identifiers

PMID25865538
PMCPMC4396710
OpenAlexW1965618395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.