ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2015
The impact of endoscopic sinus surgery on total direct healthcare costs among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare Resource Utilization for Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- Is greater antibiotic therapy prior to ESS associated with differences in surgical outcomes in CRS?The Laryngoscope · 2019Observational
- A pathway to value-based care of chronic rhinosinusitis using a claims database.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2019Article
- Operative time and cost variability for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019Article
- The personal financial burden of chronic rhinosinusitis: A Canadian perspective.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates how endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) impacts total direct healthcare costs, medication usage, and frequency of imaging among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
methodsData were obtained from the MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters databases (Truven Health Analytics); patients who underwent ESS for CRS in 2008 were identified. Healthcare costs, days of antibiotic and oral steroid usage, and number of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were collected for 12 months prior to and 36 months after surgery and compared in 1-year intervals.
resultsA total of 8963 surgical patients were included. Median total direct costs fell from $4750 at preoperative baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], $4661 to $4838) to $4212 by year 3 after surgery (95% CI, $4078 to $4346). Disease-specific costs related to conditions commonly associated with CRS-asthma, allergy, depression, and headache-all decreased in the years after surgery; the reduction was significant for all conditions but asthma. Mean days of antibiotic usage per year decreased from 28.2 days before surgery to 15.9 days by year 3 after surgery, p value <0.001. Days of oral corticosteroid usage remained stable at just over 7 days. Mean number of imaging studies fell from an average of 1.6 in the year before surgery to 0.2 by year 3 after surgery, p value <0.001.
conclusionAmong patients who underwent ESS for CRS, total direct healthcare costs, antibiotic usage, and number of imaging studies decreased after surgery, and remained below preoperative levels throughout all 3 years of follow-up. Oral corticosteroid usage remained stable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.