ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2015
Gene therapy to restore electrophysiological function in heart failure.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Electroactive Therapeutic Platforms for Cardiac Arrhythmia Management.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- What Do We Know So Far About Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction in the Mitral Valve Prolapse Population? Could Biomarkers Help Us Predict Their Occurrence?Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Classic and Novel Biomarkers as Potential Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Pathophysiology of Calcium Mediated Ventricular Arrhythmias and Novel Therapeutic Options with Focus on Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Cardiac tissue engineering: state-of-the-art methods and outlook.Journal of biological engineering · 2019Review
- Restoring heart function and electrical integrity: closing the circuit.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHeart failure (HF) is a major public health epidemic and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Existing treatments for patients with HF are often associated with pro-arrhythmic activity and risk of sudden cardiac death. Therefore, development of novel, effective and safe therapeutic options for HF patients is a critical area of unmet need. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review recent advances in the emerging field of cardiac gene therapy for the treatment of tachy- and bradyarrhythmias in HF. We provide an overview of gene-based approaches that modulate myocardial conduction, repolarization, calcium cycling and adrenergic signaling to restore heart rate and rhythm. EXPERT OPINION: We highlight major advantages of gene therapy for arrhythmias, including the ability to selectively target specific cell populations and to limit the therapeutic effect to the region that requires modification. We illustrate how advances in our fundamental understanding of the molecular origins of arrhythmogenic disorders are allowing investigators to use targeted gene-based approaches to successfully correct abnormal excitability in the atria, ventricles and conduction system. Translation of various gene therapy approaches to humans may revolutionize our ability to combat lethal arrhythmias in HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.