Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25864571›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2015

Targeting aspirin in acute disabling ischemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of three large randomized trials.

Douglas D Thompson, Gordon D Murray, Livia Candelise, Zhengming Chen, Peter A G Sandercock, William N Whiteley

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas D ThompsonEdinburgh MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Gordon D MurrayEdinburgh MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Livia CandeliseNeurology Unit, Ca'Granda Foundation, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Zhengming ChenClinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter A G SandercockEdinburgh MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
William N WhiteleyEdinburgh MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800803Medical Research Council G0902303Medical Research Council MC_U137686851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspirin is of moderate overall benefit for patients with acute disabling ischemic stroke. It is unclear whether functional outcome could be improved after stroke by targeting aspirin to patients with a high risk of recurrent thrombosis or a low risk of haemorrhage.

aimsWe aimed to determine whether patients at higher risk of thrombotic events or poor functional outcome, or lower risk of major haemorrhage had a greater absolute risk reduction of poor functional outcome with aspirin than the average patient.

methodsWe used data on individual ischemic stroke patients from three large trials of aspirin vs. placebo in acute ischemic stroke: the first International Stroke Trial (n = 18,372), the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (n = 20,172) and the Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial (n = 622). We developed and evaluated clinical prediction models for the following: early thrombotic events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism); early haemorrhagic events (significant intracranial haemorrhage, major extracranial haemorrhage, or haemorrhagic transformation of an infarct); and late poor functional outcome. We calculated the absolute risk reduction of poor functional outcome (death or dependence) at final follow-up in: quartiles of early thrombotic risk; quartiles of early haemorrhagic risk; and deciles of poor functional outcome risk.

resultsIschemic stroke patients who were older, had lower blood pressure, computerized tomography evidence of infarct or more severe deficits due to stroke had increased risk of thrombotic and haemorrhagic events and poor functional outcome. Prediction models built with all baseline variables (including onset to treatment time) discriminated weakly between patients with and without recurrent thrombotic events (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0·56, 95% CI:0·53-0·59) and haemorrhagic events (0·57, 0·52-0·64), though well between patients with and without poor functional outcome (0·77, 0·76-0·78) in the International Stroke Trial. We found no evidence that the net benefit of aspirin increased with increasing risk of thrombosis, haemorrhage or poor functional outcome in all three trials.

conclusionsUsing simple clinical variables to target aspirin to patients after acute disabling stroke by risk of thrombosis, haemorrhage or poor functional outcome does not lead to greater net clinical benefit. We suggest future risk stratification schemes include new risk factors for thrombosis and intracranial haemorrhage.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirinBrain IschemiaFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesMaleMolecular Sequence DataMulticenter Studies as TopicRisk FactorsStrokeThrombosisAspirinFibrinolytic Agentsindividual patient data meta-analysispredictionrandomized clinical trialsstratified treatmentstroke

Identifiers

PMID25864571
PMCPMC4973666
OpenAlexW1975532707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.