Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25864150›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2015

Participation and diffusion effects of a peer-intervention for HIV prevention among adults in rural Malawi.

Kathleen S Crittenden, Chrissie P N Kaponda, Diana L Jere, Linda L McCreary, Kathleen F Norr

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measurement and evaluation of community engagement in complex, chronic medical conditions: HIV and obesity as exemplar conditions.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen S CrittendenSociology Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680, USA. Electronic address: kcritt@uic.edu.
Chrissie P N KapondaKamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Private Bag 1, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Diana L JereKamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Private Bag 1, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Linda L McCrearyCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 S. Damen Avenue, IL 60612, Chicago, USA.
Kathleen F NorrCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 S. Damen Avenue, IL 60612, Chicago, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

Mobilizing Health Workers for HIV Prevention in MalawiR01NR008058 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NORR, KATHLEEN F · 2001 to 2005
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008058NINR NIH HHS R01 NR08058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines whether a peer group intervention that reduced self-reported risky behaviors for rural adults in Malawi also had impacts on non-participants in the same communities. We randomly assigned two districts to the intervention and control conditions, and conducted surveys at baseline and 18 months post-intervention using unmatched independent random samples of intervention and control communities in 2003-2006. The six-session peer group intervention was offered to same-gender groups by trained volunteers. In this analysis, we divided the post-intervention sample into three exposure groups: 243 participants and 170 non-participants from the intervention district (total n = 415) and 413 control individuals. Controlling for demographics and participation, there were significant favorable diffusion effects on five partially overlapping behavioral outcomes: partner communication, ever used condoms, unprotected sex, recent HIV test, and a community HIV prevention index. Non-participants in the intervention district had more favorable outcomes on these behaviors than survey respondents in the control district. One behavioral outcome, community HIV prevention, showed both participation and diffusion effects. Participating in the intervention had a significant effect on six psychosocial outcomes: HIV knowledge (two measures), hope, condom attitudes, and self-efficacy for community HIV prevention and for safer sex; there were no diffusion effects. This pattern of results suggests that the behavioral changes promoted in the intervention spread to others in the same community, most likely through direct contact between participants and non-participants. These findings support the idea that diffusion of HIV-related behavior changes can occur for peer group interventions in communities, adding to the body of research supporting diffusion of innovations theory as a robust approach to accelerating change. If diffusion occurs, peer group intervention may be more cost-effective than previously realized. Wider implementation of peer group interventions can help meet the global goal of reducing new HIV infections.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePeer GroupAdultCondomsDiffusion of InnovationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalawiMaleMiddle AgedRisk Reduction BehaviorRural PopulationSafe SexYoung AdultDiffusion of innovationsHIVMalawiPeer groupPrimary preventionRisk reduction behavior

Identifiers

PMID25864150
PMCPMC4529989
OpenAlexW2073660229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.