ArticleEmergency radiology2015
Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating clinical indicators for neuroimaging abnormalities in acute headache cases: insights from a retrospective study.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Necessity and Radiation Risk of Brain CT Scans Requested by the Trauma Emergency Department.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2023Article
- Headache in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Observational Study from Singapore.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Evaluating the Outcome of an Unnecessary Request for CT Scan in Be'sat Hospital of Hamadan.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- The degree and appropriateness of computed tomography utilization for diagnosis of headaches in Ghana.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Nontraumatic Headache in Adult Emergency Patients: Prevalence, Etiologies, and Radiological Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Clinical predictors of significant intracranial computed tomography scan findings in adults experiencing headache disorder.The Pan African medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the incidence of positive computed tomography (CT) findings in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic headache at our institution and (2) to examine follow-up exams, including lumbar puncture, non-enhanced CT, CT angiogram, CT venogram, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to see how often the use of further testing changes the diagnosis. With IRB approval, 865 patients were identified through ED requisitions for CT head with the indication of headache during the calendar year 2011. Exclusion criteria included head trauma, prior intracranial surgery, focal neurologic symptoms, and known intracranial mass. CT results were divided into three categories: P0, P1, and P2. Negative studies were graded as P0. Positive studies were subdivided into clinically insignificant or P1 and clinically significant or P2. Clinically significant was defined as requiring medical treatment. Subsequently, the electronic medical records and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) were reviewed to determine the incidence of follow-up exams, including lumbar puncture or imaging. The secondary tests were divided into the same P0, P1, and P2 categories. There were 254 positive studies: P1 clinically insignificant (27.1 %, 235/865) and P2 clinically significant (2.2 %, 19/865). Of 257 follow-up exams performed, the majority were lumbar punctures (36.0 %) or CT angiograms (29.5 %). In 19/257 exams or 7.4 %, the additional testing changed the clinically insignificant (P0/P1) diagnosis to a significant (P2) result. At our institution, there was a 2.2 % incidence of significant positive CT findings in patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic headache. Follow-up testing was variable and resulted in a 7.4 % increase in the severity of diagnosis compared to the initial negative CT scan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.