Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25863311›Full record

ReviewAnaerobe2015

Microbiota and probiotics in canine and feline welfare.

Łukasz Grześkowiak, Akihito Endo, Shea Beasley, Seppo Salminen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaerobe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Canine-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled study.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A NovelMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Łukasz GrześkowiakFunctional Foods Forum, Univeristy of Turku, Turku, Finland. Electronic address: lukgrz@me.com.
Akihito EndoDepartment of Food and Cosmetic Science, Faculty of Bioindustry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shea BeasleyVetcare Ltd., Mäntsälä, Finland.
Seppo SalminenFunctional Foods Forum, Univeristy of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tokyo University of Agriculture · JPUniversity of Turku · FIVetcare (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs and cats have been cohabiting with us for thousands of years. They are the major human companions. Today, dogs and cats live in urban areas. Cats and most dogs are on high carbohydrate diets and face similar life-style challenges as the human beings. The health and well-being of companion animals, just as their owners, depends on the gut microbes. Providing a proper care and nutritionally balanced diet to companion animals is recognised as a part of our responsibility to maintain the health and well being of our pet. However, as microbiota differences may facilitate exposure to pathogens and harmful environmental influences, it is prudent to search for novel tools to protect dogs and cats and at the same time the human owners from pathogens. Specific probiotic strains and/or their defined combinations may be useful in the canine and feline nutrition, therapy, and care. Probiotic supplementations have been successful in the prevention and treatment of acute gastroenteritis, treatment of IBD, and prevention of allergy in companion animals. New challenges for probiotic applications include maintenance of obesity and overweight, urogenital tract infections, Helicobacter gastritis and parasitic infections. The probiotics of human origin appear to be among the new promising tools for the maintenance of pets' health. However, the host-derived microorganisms might be the most appropriate probiotic source. Therefore, more controlled trials are needed to characterise new and safe probiotic preparations with an impact on general health and well being as well as health maintenance in dogs and cats.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDietDog DiseasesDogsProbioticsCatDogGut microbiotaHealthPrebioticProbioticVeterinary care

Identifiers

PMID25863311
PMCPMC7111060
OpenAlexW2033139935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.