ArticleNeuropsychologia2015
Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Embodied grounding of abstract concepts: an image-based comparative analysis of sensorimotor and emotional experiences in Chinese.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- The role of vocabulary concreteness in modulating embodied semantic representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Experientially-grounded and distributional semantic vectors uncover dissociable representations of conceptual categories.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024Article
- Cross-domain semantic alignment: concrete concepts are more abstract than you think.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- The Role of Affective Sensemaking in the Constitution of Experience. The Affective Pertinentization Model (APER).Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2022Article
- The neural representation of abstract words may arise through grounding word meaning in language itself.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- From Affordances to Abstract Words: The Flexibility of Sensorimotor Grounding.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Quantum semantics of text perception.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition.Journal of cognition · 2020Article
- An Integrated Neural Decoder of Linguistic and Experiential Meaning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- How pattern information analyses of semantic brain activity elicited in language comprehension could contribute to the early identification of Alzheimer's Disease.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Review
- Brain Activation During Conceptual Processing of Action and Sound Verbs.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2019Article
- The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics.Memory & cognition · 2018Article
- A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders.Nature human behaviour · 2017Article
- The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2017Article
- Pacifier Overuse and Conceptual Relations of Abstract and Emotional Concepts.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While major advances have been made in uncovering the neural processes underlying perceptual representations, our grasp of how the brain gives rise to conceptual knowledge remains relatively poor. Recent work has provided strong evidence that concepts rely, at least in part, on the same sensory and motor neural systems through which they were acquired, but it is still unclear whether the neural code for concept representation uses information about sensory-motor features to discriminate between concepts. In the present study, we investigate this question by asking whether an encoding model based on five semantic attributes directly related to sensory-motor experience - sound, color, visual motion, shape, and manipulation - can successfully predict patterns of brain activation elicited by individual lexical concepts. We collected ratings on the relevance of these five attributes to the meaning of 820 words, and used these ratings as predictors in a multiple regression model of the fMRI signal associated with the words in a separate group of participants. The five resulting activation maps were then combined by linear summation to predict the distributed activation pattern elicited by a novel set of 80 test words. The encoding model predicted the activation patterns elicited by the test words significantly better than chance. As expected, prediction was successful for concrete but not for abstract concepts. Comparisons between encoding models based on different combinations of attributes indicate that all five attributes contribute to the representation of concrete concepts. Consistent with embodied theories of semantics, these results show, for the first time, that the distributed activation pattern associated with a concept combines information about different sensory-motor attributes according to their respective relevance. Future research should investigate how additional features of phenomenal experience contribute to the neural representation of conceptual knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.