Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25863070›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Allosteric effects of sodium ion binding on activation of the m3 muscarinic g-protein-coupled receptor.

Yinglong Miao, Alisha D Caliman, J Andrew McCammon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting Biomolecular Binding Kinetics: A Review.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep Learning Dynamic Allostery of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Binding Analysis Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Future Perspectives.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomedicines · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yinglong MiaoHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: yimiao@ucsd.edu.
Alisha D CalimanDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
J Andrew McCammonHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN CELLULAR &MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGYT32GM007752 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BROWN, JOAN HELLER, HANDEL, TRACY M · 1985 to 2023
$13.5M
THEORY OF BIOMOLECULAR DIFFUSIONR01GM031749 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HUBER, GARY ALEXANDER, MCCAMMON, JAMES ANDREW · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031749NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important membrane proteins that mediate cellular signaling and represent primary targets for about one-third of currently marketed drugs. Recent x-ray crystallographic studies identified distinct conformations of GPCRs in the active and inactive states. An allosteric sodium ion was found bound to a highly conserved D2.50 residue in inactive GPCRs, whereas the D2.50 allosteric pocket became collapsed in active GPCR structures. However, the dynamic mechanisms underlying these observations remain elusive. In this study, we aimed to understand the mechanistic effects of sodium ion binding on dynamic activation of the M3 muscarinic GPCR through long-timescale accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations. Results showed that with the D2.50 residue deprotonated, the M3 receptor is bound by an allosteric sodium ion and confined mostly in the inactive state with remarkably reduced flexibility. In contrast, the D2.50-protonated receptor does not exhibit sodium ion binding to the D2.50 allosteric site and samples a significantly larger conformational space. The receptor activation is captured and characterized by large-scale structural rearrangements of the transmembrane helices via dynamic hydrogen bond and salt bridge interactions. The residue motions are highly correlated during receptor activation. Further network analysis revealed that the allosteric signaling between residue D2.50 and key residues in the intracellular, extracellular, and orthosteric pockets is significantly weakened upon sodium ion binding.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteAmino Acid SequenceMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingReceptor, Muscarinic M3SodiumReceptor, Muscarinic M3Sodium

Identifiers

PMID25863070
PMCPMC4390834
OpenAlexW2013239221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.