Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25863062›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Catch bond interaction between cell-surface sulfatase Sulf1 and glycosaminoglycans.

Alexander Harder, Ann-Kristin Möller, Fabian Milz, Phillipp Neuhaus, Volker Walhorn, Thomas Dierks, Dario Anselmetti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Energetic Landscape of Catch Bonds in TCR Interfaces.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander HarderExperimental Biophysics, Physics Faculty, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ann-Kristin MöllerExperimental Biophysics, Physics Faculty, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Fabian MilzBiochemistry I, Faculty of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Phillipp NeuhausBiochemistry I, Faculty of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Volker WalhornExperimental Biophysics, Physics Faculty, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. Electronic address: volker.walhorn@physik.uni-bielefeld.de.
Thomas DierksBiochemistry I, Faculty of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Dario AnselmettiExperimental Biophysics, Physics Faculty, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biological adhesion, the biophysical mechanism of specific biomolecular interaction can be divided in slip and catch bonds, respectively. Conceptually, slip bonds exhibit a reduced bond lifetime under increased external force and catch bonds, in contrast, exhibit an increased lifetime (for a certain force interval). Since 2003, a handful of biological systems have been identified to display catch bond properties. Upon investigating the specific interaction between the unique hydrophilic domain (HD) of the human cell-surface sulfatase Sulf1 against its physiological glycosaminoglycan (GAG) target heparan sulfate (HS) by single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), we found clear evidence of catch bond behavior in this system. The HD, ∼320 amino acids long with dominant positive charge, and its interaction with sulfated GAG-polymers were quantitatively investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) based force clamp spectroscopy (FCS) and dynamic force spectroscopy (DFS). In FCS experiments, we found that the catch bond character of HD against GAGs could be attributed to the GAG 6-O-sulfation site whereas only slip bond interaction can be observed in a GAG system where this site is explicitly lacking. We interpreted the binding data within the theoretical framework of a two state two path model, where two slip bonds are coupled forming a double-well interaction potential with an energy difference of ΔE ≈ 9 kBT and a compliance length of Δx ≈ 3.2 nm. Additional DFS experiments support this assumption and allow identification of these two coupled slip-bond states that behave consistently within the Kramers-Bell-Evans model of force-mediated dissociation.

Indexed as

Heparan SulfateHumansProtein BindingSulfotransferasesHeparan SulfateSULF1 protein, humanSulfotransferases

Identifiers

PMID25863062
PMCPMC4390821
OpenAlexW2030080371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.