Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25862761›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Systematic Screening Identifies Dual PI3K and mTOR Inhibition as a Conserved Therapeutic Vulnerability in Osteosarcoma.

Ankita Gupte, Emma K Baker, Soo-San Wan, Elizabeth Stewart, Amos Loh, Anang A Shelat, Cathryn M Gould, Alistair M Chalk, Scott Taylor, Kurt Lackovic and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Repurposing Drugs in Small Animal Oncology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recent and current clinical trials in canine appendicular osteosarcoma.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ankita GupteSt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Emma K BakerSt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Soo-San WanThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth StewartDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Amos LohDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Anang A ShelatDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Cathryn M GouldVictorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alistair M ChalkSt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Scott TaylorSt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Kurt LackovicThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Åsa KarlströmDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Anthony J MutsaersSt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jayesh DesaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Piyush B MadhamshettiwarDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Andrew C W ZannettinoMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Chris BurnsThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
David C S HuangThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael A DyerDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland. cwalkley@svi.edu.au michael.dyer@stjude.org.
Kaylene J SimpsonVictorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Carl R WalkleySt. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. ACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. cwalkley@svi.edu.au michael.dyer@stjude.org.
University of Melbourne · AUSt Vincents Institute of Medical Research · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsteosarcoma is the most common cancer of bone occurring mostly in teenagers. Despite rapid advances in our knowledge of the genetics and cell biology of osteosarcoma, significant improvements in patient survival have not been observed. The identification of effective therapeutics has been largely empirically based. The identification of new therapies and therapeutic targets are urgently needed to enable improved outcomes for osteosarcoma patients. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe have used genetically engineered murine models of human osteosarcoma in a systematic, genome-wide screen to identify new candidate therapeutic targets. We performed a genome-wide siRNA screen, with or without doxorubicin. In parallel, a screen of therapeutically relevant small molecules was conducted on primary murine- and primary human osteosarcoma-derived cell cultures. All results were validated across independent cell cultures and across human and mouse osteosarcoma.

resultsThe results from the genetic and chemical screens significantly overlapped, with a profound enrichment of pathways regulated by PI3K and mTOR pathways. Drugs that concurrently target both PI3K and mTOR were effective at inducing apoptosis in primary osteosarcoma cell cultures in vitro in both human and mouse osteosarcoma, whereas specific PI3K or mTOR inhibitors were not effective. The results were confirmed with siRNA and small molecule approaches. Rationale combinations of specific PI3K and mTOR inhibitors could recapitulate the effect on osteosarcoma cell cultures.

conclusionsThe approaches described here have identified dual inhibition of the PI3K-mTOR pathway as a sensitive, druggable target in osteosarcoma, and provide rationale for translational studies with these agents.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGenetic EngineeringHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceOsteosarcomaRNA, Small InterferingTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsRNA, Small InterferingTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25862761
PMCPMC4506243
OpenAlexW1979364783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.