ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2015
Parameterization for molecular Gaussian surface and a comparison study of surface mesh generation.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Identification of IL-17 a Small-Molecule Inhibitors as Potential Therapeutics for Plaque Psoriasis Through e-Pharmacophore Screening, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.The protein journal · 2026Article
- The Area Law of Molecular Entropy: Moving beyond Harmonic Approximation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Frontiers in biomolecular mesh generation and molecular visualization systems.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2018Review
- Molecular Surface Remeshing with Local Region Refinement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Quality improvement of surface triangular mesh using a modified Laplacian smoothing approach avoiding intersection.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular Gaussian surface has been frequently used in the field of molecular modeling and simulation. Typically, the Gaussian surface is defined using two controlling parameters; the decay rate and isovalue. Currently, there is a lack of studies in which a systematic approach in the determination of optimal parameterization according to the geometric features has been done. In this paper, surface area, volume enclosed by the surface and Hausdorff distance are used as three criteria for the parameterization to make the Gaussian surface approximate the solvent excluded surface (SES) well. For each of these three criteria, a search of the parameter space is carried out in order to determine the optimal parameter values. The resulted parameters are close to each other and result in similar calculated molecular properties. Approximation of the VDW surface is also done by analyzing the explicit expressions of the Gaussian surface and VDW surface, which analysis and parameters can be similarly applied to the solvent accessible surface (SAS) due to its geometric similarity to the VDW surface. Once the optimal parameters are obtained, we compare the performance of our Gaussian surface generation software TMSmesh with other commonly used software programs, focusing primarily on mesh quality and fidelity. Additionally, the Poisson-Boltzmann solvation energies based on the surface meshes generated by TMSmesh and those generated by other software programs are calculated and compared for a set of molecules with different sizes. The results of these comparisons validate both the accuracy and the applicability of the parameterized Gaussian surface.
Identifiers
25862632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.