Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25862539›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2016

A psychometric investigation of "macroscopic" speech measures for clinical and psychological science.

Alex S Cohen, Tyler L Renshaw, Kyle R Mitchell, Yunjung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Humanizing "multimodal" digital phenotyping of serious mental illness.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High Predictive Accuracy of Negative Schizotypy With Acoustic Measures.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex S CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. acohen@lsu.edu.
Tyler L RenshawDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Kyle R MitchellDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Yunjung KimDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.

Funding

Identifying the Vocal Markers of Schizophrenia-Spectrum DisordersR03MH092622 · NIMH · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI COHEN, ALEX S · 2011 to 2012
$148k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH092622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of vocal expression is a critical endeavor for psychological and clinical sciences and is an increasingly popular application for computer-human interfaces. Despite this, and despite advances in the efficiency, affordability, and sophistication of vocal analytic technologies, there is considerable variability across studies regarding what aspects of vocal expression are studied. Vocal signals can be quantified in a myriad of ways, and their underlying structure, at least with respect to "macroscopic" measures from extended speech, is presently unclear. To address this issue, we evaluated the psychometric properties-notably, the structural and construct validity-of a systematically defined set of global vocal features. Our analytic strategy focused on (a) identifying redundant variables among this set, (b) employing principal components analysis (PCA) to identify nonoverlapping domains of vocal expression, (c) examining the degrees to which the vocal variables are modulated as a function of changes in speech task, and (d) evaluating the relationship between the vocal variables and cognitive (i.e., verbal fluency) and clinical (i.e., depression, anxiety, and hostility) variables. Spontaneous speech samples from 11 independent studies of young adults (>60 s in length), employing one of three different speaking tasks, were examined (N = 1,350). Confounding variables (i.e., sex, ethnicity) were statistically controlled for. The PCA identified six distinct domains of vocal expression. Collectively, vocal expression (defined in terms of these domains) was modulated as a function of speech task and was related to the cognitive and clinical variables. These findings provide empirically grounded implications for the study of vocal expression in psychological and clinical sciences.

Indexed as

Speech Production MeasurementAnxietyCognitionDepressionFemaleHostilityHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisPsychometricsSpeechSpeech AcousticsYoung AdultAcousticExpressionFrequencyIntensityProsodyVoice

Identifiers

PMID25862539
PMCPMC4600643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.