ArticleBehavior research methods2016
A psychometric investigation of "macroscopic" speech measures for clinical and psychological science.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Humanizing "multimodal" digital phenotyping of serious mental illness.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Enhanced classification and severity prediction of major depressive disorder using acoustic features and machine learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Lexical Speech Features of Spontaneous Speech in Older Persons With and Without Cognitive Impairment: Reliability Analysis.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Improving the Applicability of AI for Psychiatric Applications through Human-in-the-loop Methodologies.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Ambulatory audio and video recording for digital phenotyping in schizophrenia: Adherence & data usability.Psychiatry research · 2022Article
- High Predictive Accuracy of Negative Schizotypy With Acoustic Measures.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- Monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions in depression through self-assessments.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2021Article
- Digital phenotyping of negative symptoms: the relationship to clinician ratings.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Article
- Validating Biobehavioral Technologies for Use in Clinical Psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Using machine learning of computerized vocal expression to measure blunted vocal affect and alogia.NPJ schizophrenia · 2020Article
- An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders.Scientific data · 2017Article
- A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017Article
- Vocal expression in schizophrenia: Less than meets the ear.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2016Article
- Speech deficits in serious mental illness: a cognitive resource issue?Schizophrenia research · 2014Article
- Automated assessment of speech production and prediction of MCI in older adults.Applied neuropsychology. AdultArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of vocal expression is a critical endeavor for psychological and clinical sciences and is an increasingly popular application for computer-human interfaces. Despite this, and despite advances in the efficiency, affordability, and sophistication of vocal analytic technologies, there is considerable variability across studies regarding what aspects of vocal expression are studied. Vocal signals can be quantified in a myriad of ways, and their underlying structure, at least with respect to "macroscopic" measures from extended speech, is presently unclear. To address this issue, we evaluated the psychometric properties-notably, the structural and construct validity-of a systematically defined set of global vocal features. Our analytic strategy focused on (a) identifying redundant variables among this set, (b) employing principal components analysis (PCA) to identify nonoverlapping domains of vocal expression, (c) examining the degrees to which the vocal variables are modulated as a function of changes in speech task, and (d) evaluating the relationship between the vocal variables and cognitive (i.e., verbal fluency) and clinical (i.e., depression, anxiety, and hostility) variables. Spontaneous speech samples from 11 independent studies of young adults (>60 s in length), employing one of three different speaking tasks, were examined (N = 1,350). Confounding variables (i.e., sex, ethnicity) were statistically controlled for. The PCA identified six distinct domains of vocal expression. Collectively, vocal expression (defined in terms of these domains) was modulated as a function of speech task and was related to the cognitive and clinical variables. These findings provide empirically grounded implications for the study of vocal expression in psychological and clinical sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.