ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2016
Use of a facilitated discussion model for antenatal care to improve communication.
Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of providers' experiences of facilitating group antenatal care.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Communication Interventions in Obstetrics-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Group antenatal care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic evidence synthesis.Reproductive health · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of group antenatal care on lactational amenorrhea method awareness and knowledge: A cluster randomized control trial.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Ghanaian women's experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) during group antenatal care: a brief report from a cluster randomised controlled trial.Global health action · 2024Trial
- Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Trial
- Knowledge, Acceptance, and Uptake of Family Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Trial
- Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- Trial
- An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial assessing the impact of group versus individual antenatal care on maternal and infant outcomes in Malawi.BMC public health · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Innovation in prenatal care: a global review of implementing group prenatal care and impacts on women, children, and health care providers.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Exploring the acceptability and impact of group antenatal care: a qualitative study among women in selected health facilities in Burkina Faso.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Measuring health professionals' capability to respond to health consumers' health literacy needs: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Women Health Literacy and Associated Factors on Women and Child Health Care in Ilu Ababor Public Health Facilities, Ethiopia.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Non-adherence to WHO's recommended 8-contact model: geospatial analysis of the 2017 Maternal Health Survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Maternal hypertensive mother's knowledge, attitudes and misconceptions on hypertension in pregnancy: A multi-center qualitative study in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Group Antenatal Care in Ghana: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Building a Global Evidence Base to Guide Policy and Implementation for Group Antenatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Key Principles and Research Framework Recommendations from the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAchieving health literacy is a critical step to improving health outcomes and the health of a nation. However, there is a lack of research on health literacy in low-resource countries, where maternal health outcomes are at their worst.
objectivesTo examine the usefulness and feasibility of providing focused antenatal care (FANC) in a group setting using picture cards to improve patient-provider communication, patient engagement, and improve health literacy.
designAn exploratory, mixed methods design was employed to gather pilot data using the Health Literacy Skills Framework. SETTINGS: A busy urban district hospital in the Ashanti Region of Ghana was used to gather data during 2014.
participantsA facility-driven convenience sample of midwives (n=6) aged 18 years or older, who could speak English or Twi, and had provided antenatal care at the participating hospital during the previous year prior to the start of the study participated in the study.
methodsData were collected using pre-test and post-test surveys, completed three months after the group FANC was implemented. A semi-structured focus group was conducted with four of the participating midwives and the registered nurse providing support and supervision for the study (n=5) at the time of the post-test. Data were analyzed concurrently to gain a broad understanding of patient communication, engagement, and group FANC.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the mean communication (t(df=3)=0.541, p=0.626) and engagement (t(df=3)=-0.775, p=0.495) scores between the pre- and post-test. However, the focus group revealed the following themes: (a) improved communication through the use of picture cards; (b) enhanced information sharing and peer support through the facilitated group process and; and (c) an improved understanding of patient concerns.
conclusionsThe improved communication noted through the use of picture cards and the enhanced information sharing and peer support elicited through the group FANC undoubtedly provided patients with additional tools to invoke self-determination, and carry out the behaviors they thought were most important to improve pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.