Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25862409›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2016

Use of a facilitated discussion model for antenatal care to improve communication.

Jody R Lori, Michelle L Munro, Meagan R Chuey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of Communication Interventions in Obstetrics-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jody R LoriUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 3320, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: jrlori@umich.edu.
Michelle L MunroUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 3188, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: mlmunro@umich.edu.
Meagan R ChueyUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 3352, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: meachuey@gmail.com.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

New Avenues to Increase the Use of Skilled Birth Attendants in GhanaK01TW008763 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LORI, JODY RAE · 2011 to 2015
$704k
FIC NIH HHS 1 K01 TW008763-01A1FIC NIH HHS K01 TW008763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving health literacy is a critical step to improving health outcomes and the health of a nation. However, there is a lack of research on health literacy in low-resource countries, where maternal health outcomes are at their worst.

objectivesTo examine the usefulness and feasibility of providing focused antenatal care (FANC) in a group setting using picture cards to improve patient-provider communication, patient engagement, and improve health literacy.

designAn exploratory, mixed methods design was employed to gather pilot data using the Health Literacy Skills Framework. SETTINGS: A busy urban district hospital in the Ashanti Region of Ghana was used to gather data during 2014.

participantsA facility-driven convenience sample of midwives (n=6) aged 18 years or older, who could speak English or Twi, and had provided antenatal care at the participating hospital during the previous year prior to the start of the study participated in the study.

methodsData were collected using pre-test and post-test surveys, completed three months after the group FANC was implemented. A semi-structured focus group was conducted with four of the participating midwives and the registered nurse providing support and supervision for the study (n=5) at the time of the post-test. Data were analyzed concurrently to gain a broad understanding of patient communication, engagement, and group FANC.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the mean communication (t(df=3)=0.541, p=0.626) and engagement (t(df=3)=-0.775, p=0.495) scores between the pre- and post-test. However, the focus group revealed the following themes: (a) improved communication through the use of picture cards; (b) enhanced information sharing and peer support through the facilitated group process and; and (c) an improved understanding of patient concerns.

conclusionsThe improved communication noted through the use of picture cards and the enhanced information sharing and peer support elicited through the group FANC undoubtedly provided patients with additional tools to invoke self-determination, and carry out the behaviors they thought were most important to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAudiovisual AidsFemaleGhanaHumansMiddle AgedMidwiferyModels, TheoreticalPregnancyPrenatal CareYoung AdultAfricaAntenatal careCommunicationFocused antenatal careGhanaGroup careHealth literacyMaternal healthMidwiferyMixed methodology

Identifiers

PMID25862409
PMCPMC4592694
OpenAlexW1966086716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.