ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.International urogynecology journal · 2016Trial
- The evaluation of the tests that can predict de novo stress urinary incontinence after advanced pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a prospective study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Hysteropexy: Does Concomitant Anterior and Posterior Fixation Using a Posterior Approach Route Improve Surgical Outcomes?International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- De-Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Apical Prolapse Surgery: Potential Link with the Zone of Critical Elasticity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Course and Conservative Strategy for Persistent De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Transvaginal Mesh.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Association of post-operative transperineal ultrasound parameters with de novo stress urinary incontinence following transvaginal mesh surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison Between Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) and Anterior Mesh (Surelift-A) in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-Up.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Anterior-apical Transvaginal Mesh (Calistar-S) for Treatment of Advanced Urogenital Prolapse: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1 Year.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).International urogynecology journal · 2024Observational
- International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction.International urogynecology journal · 2023Review
- Modified Vaginal Mesh Procedure with DynaMeshDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of intrinsic sphincter deficiency on mid-urethral sling outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- A web-based fuzzy risk predictive-decision model of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Current urology · 2021Article
- Stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal mesh surgery for anterior and apical prolapse: preoperative risk factors.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Determining the risk factors and characteristics of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review.Turkish journal of urology · 2020Review
- The clinical and urodynamic outcomes of single-incision mesh surgery using the Uphold system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following pelvic reconstruction surgery with transvaginal single-incisional mesh.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Influence of Patient's Age on the Outcome of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Procedures in Urogynaecology.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to look for possible predictors preoperatively for the development of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in urodynamically continent women who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS). MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical records of 637 continent women who underwent PRS for severe prolapse from January 2005 to December 2013 in our institutions were included in this study. We excluded women who had urodynamic stress incontinence (UDI) either occult or overt, detrusor overactivity, neurogenic bladder-voiding dysfunction, and previous anti-incontinent surgery. Primary outcome measure was the development of de novo SUI at 6 months to 1 year post operation.
resultsOf women in this study, 11 % developed postoperative de novo SUI at 6 months to 1 year of follow-up. Women older than 66 years were 2.86 times [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.53, p = 0.14], diabetes mellitus (DM) 2.18 times (95 % CI 1.63-4.21, p = 0.002), certain type of transvaginal mesh procedure 3.5 times (95 % CI, p < 0.001), maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) < 60 mmH20 4.65 times (95 % CI, 2.87-8.64, p < 0.001), and functional urethral length (FUL) < 2 cm 3.48 times (95 % CI, 2.13-5.83, p < 0.001) at greater risk of developing de novo SUI.
conclusionsContinent women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) > 66 years, with DM or low MUCP and FUL values during preoperative urodynamic evaluation have higher risk of developing de novo SUI; therefore, we suggest counselling such women for concomitant PRS and anti-incontinent surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25862240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.