Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861994›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2016

Comparison of pain management after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without epidural analgesia.

Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Shuji Takiguchi, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Jota Mikami, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Makoto Yamasaki, Hiroshi Miyata, Kiyokazu Nakajima and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of an epidural in laparoscopic surgeries.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shuji TakiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. stakiguchi@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yasuhiro MiyazakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Jota MikamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Makoto YamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kiyokazu NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, E-2, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal analgesia following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) has not been determined; moreover, it has been unclear whether epidural anesthesia has benefits for laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of epidural analgesia after LDG.

methodsThis retrospective study included 84 patients who underwent LDG for gastric cancer. Patients received either combined thoracic epidural and general anesthesia (Epidural group, n = 34) or general anesthesia alone (No epidural group, n = 50). We recorded data on the patients, surgery, postoperative outcomes and anesthesia-related complications.

resultsIn the Epidural group, the first day of flatus was significantly earlier (2.21 vs. 2.44 days, p = 0.045) and the number of additional doses of analgesics was significantly lower (2.85 vs. 4.86 doses, p = 0.007) than in the No epidural group. Postoperative urinary retention occurred at a significantly higher rate in the Epidural group (n = 7; 20.6 %) than in the No epidural group (p < 0.001).

conclusionEpidural anesthesia may reduce the need for additional analgesics after LDG, but increases the risk of urinary retention.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralGastrectomyLaparoscopyPostoperative CareAgedAnalgesicsAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleFentanylHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementRetrospective StudiesRiskAnalgesicsFentanylEpidural anesthesiaLaparoscopic distal gastrectomyUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID25861994
OpenAlexW2076949121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.