Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861892›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015

The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures.

M Kunz, S Balaketheeswaran, R E Ellis, J F Rudan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Intraoperative application of hand-held structured light scanning: a feasibility study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three-dimensional ultrasound for knee osteophyte depiction: a comparative study to computed tomography.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M KunzSchool of Computing, Queen's University, 557 Goodwin Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 2N8, Canada, kunz@queensu.ca.
S Balaketheeswaran
R E Ellis
J F Rudan

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn accurate fit of a patient-specific instrument guide during an intervention is one of the critical factors affecting accuracy of the surgical procedure. In this study, we investigated how well osteophytes, which are abnormal bone growths that form along joints, are depicted in clinical preoperative CT scans and estimated the influence of such depiction errors on the intraoperative accuracy of the guide.

methodsIn 34 hip resurfacing patients, 227 osteophyte surface points on the anterior aspect of the femoral neck were collected intraoperatively, using an optoelectronic navigation system. These points were registered to a preoperative CT scan of the patient, and distances between collected points and segmented virtual bone surface, as well as Hounsfield units for these points, were determined. We simulated the registration error of a patient-specific guide, using a modified registration algorithm, to test placement on the anterior aspect of the femoral neck without removing any osteophytes. This error was then applied to the surgical plan of the femoral central-pin position and orientation for evaluation.

resultsThe average distance between the collected points and the segmented surface was 2.6 mm. We estimated the average error for the entrance point of the central-pin to be 0.7 mm in the distal direction and 3.2 mm in the anterior direction. The average orientation error was 2.8° in anteversion.

conclusionsThe depiction of osteophytes in clinical preoperative CT scans for proximal femurs can be unreliable and can possibly result in significant intraoperative instrument alignment errors during image-guided surgeries.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFemaleFemurHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresOsteophyteRadiographySurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.