Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861818›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Parallel Structural Evolution of Mitochondrial Ribosomes and OXPHOS Complexes.

Eli O van der Sluis, Heike Bauerschmitt, Thomas Becker, Thorsten Mielke, Jens Frauenfeld, Otto Berninghausen, Walter Neupert, Johannes M Herrmann, Roland Beckmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Eukaryogenesis: Did an Oxidative Crucible Result in Misleading Bioinformatic Analyses?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Eukaryogenesis From FECA to LECA: Radical Steps Along the Way.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Methods to Study the Biogenesis of Mitoribosomal Proteins in Yeast.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Mitoribosome Biogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. The [PSIMolecular biology of the cell · 2022
    Article
  15. Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eli O van der SluisGene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, Germany vandersluis@lmb.uni-muenchen.de beckmann@lmb.uni-muenchen.de.
Heike BauerschmittCell Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Thomas BeckerGene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, Germany.
Thorsten MielkeMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, UltraStrukturNetzwerk, Berlin, Germany Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Jens FrauenfeldGene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, Germany Present address: Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Otto BerninghausenGene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, Germany.
Walter NeupertMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Johannes M HerrmannCell Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Roland BeckmannGene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, Germany vandersluis@lmb.uni-muenchen.de beckmann@lmb.uni-muenchen.de.
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The five macromolecular complexes that jointly mediate oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mitochondria consist of many more subunits than those of bacteria, yet, it remains unclear by which evolutionary mechanism(s) these novel subunits were recruited. Even less well understood is the structural evolution of mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes): while it was long thought that their exceptionally high protein content would physically compensate for their uniquely low amount of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), this hypothesis has been refuted by structural studies. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of the 73S mitoribosome from Neurospora crassa, together with genomic and proteomic analyses of mitoribosome composition across the eukaryotic domain. Surprisingly, our findings reveal that both structurally and compositionally, mitoribosomes have evolved very similarly to mitochondrial OXPHOS complexes via two distinct phases: A constructive phase that mainly acted early in eukaryote evolution, resulting in the recruitment of altogether approximately 75 novel subunits, and a reductive phase that acted during metazoan evolution, resulting in gradual length-reduction of mitochondrially encoded rRNAs and OXPHOS proteins. Both phases can be well explained by the accumulation of (slightly) deleterious mutations and deletions, respectively, in mitochondrially encoded rRNAs and OXPHOS proteins. We argue that the main role of the newly recruited (nuclear encoded) ribosomal- and OXPHOS proteins is to provide structural compensation to the mutationally destabilized mitochondrially encoded components. While the newly recruited proteins probably provide a selective advantage owing to their compensatory nature, and while their presence may have opened evolutionary pathways toward novel mitochondrion-specific functions, we emphasize that the initial events that resulted in their recruitment was nonadaptive in nature. Our framework is supported by population genetic studies, and it can explain the complete structural evolution of mitochondrial ribosomes and OXPHOS complexes, as well as many observed functions of individual proteins.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, MitochondrialMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsMutationNeurospora crassaOxidative PhosphorylationProtein SubunitsRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesRNA, RibosomalMitochondrial ProteinsProtein SubunitsRibosomal ProteinsRNA, Ribosomalcryo-electron microscopymitochondrial evolutionnonadaptive evolutionribosome

Identifiers

PMID25861818
PMCPMC4453056
OpenAlexW2170215520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.