Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861605›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2015

Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for gastric cancer.

Zhi-De Hu, Yuan-Lan Huang, Bao-Dong Qin, Qing-Qin Tang, Min Yang, Ning Ma, Hai-Tao Fu, Ting-Ting Wei, Ren-Qian Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimal management of resected gastric cancer.Cancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhi-De Hu1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Yuan-Lan Huang1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Bao-Dong Qin1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Qing-Qin Tang1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Min Yang1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Ning Ma1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Hai-Tao Fu1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Ting-Ting Wei1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Ren-Qian Zhong1 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China ; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Ji'nan Military Command Region, Ji'nan 250031, China ; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 200052, China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in gastric cancer (GC) patients has been investigated by many studies, the results are heterogeneous. The objective of this systematic review is to ascertain the prognostic value of NLR in GC patients.

methodsPubMed and Embase were retrieved to identify potential studies published before 8 June, 2014. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort study was used to assess the quality of all eligible studies.

resultsOf the 20 studies included in this systematic review, 17 studies investigated the effect of NLR on overall survival (OS), 11 studies reported that NLR negatively affected OS in their multivariante analysis, and 16 studies reported that NLR negatively affected OS in univariate analysis. Three studies investigated the effect of NLR on progression-free survival (PFS), reporting that increased NLR was associated with worse PFS. Four studies investigated the effect of NLR on disease-free survival (DFS), two of which reported that increased NLR was associated with worse DFS. Two studies investigated the effect of NLR on disease special survival (DSS), but neither observed any significant association between NLR and DSS. The major design deficiencies of the studies available were retrospective data collection, inadequacy of follow-up cohorts, and unavailability of the method used for outcome assessment.

conclusionsBased on the above findings, we conclude that NLR may be a useful prognostic index (PI) for GC. In addition, future studies with prospective design, long-term follow-up and fully adjusted confounding factors are needed to rigorously assess the prognostic value of NLR for GC.

Indexed as

gastric cancer (GC)Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)prognosissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25861605
PMCPMC4381463
OpenAlexW333271189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.